[thesite] old links

[aardvark]

> From: "Warden, Matt" <mwarden at mattwarden.com>
>
> >but why using 301 instead of 302?
> >
> >i know for a fact 302 has very broad support...
>
> I'm pretty sure we were trying to stick to the standard and not the
> hack...

which is the hack?

> 302 is permenantly moved... which is what we want
> 301 is temporarily moved (right?)... which is not what we want
>
> but, if it don't work, it don't work

we currently use 301, based on jeff's header dump...