[thesite] RE: [admin] Burning gifs from the past

[A. Erickson]

> Sure, some of the articles in that section *could* be dated. But
> a) only some of them - others are as relevent now as they were then

So, are you thinking it's not a priority?

> b) is that a problem for a 'revived article'?

I think it is. As a user, I'm *so* not interested in irrelevant info.
Personally, as a user, I'd be more interested in a "staff picks" type
thing for article revival instead of just a randomizer.

- amanda