[thesite] bad spam

William Anderson neuro at well.com
Tue May 7 18:59:00 CDT 2002


----- Original Message -----
From: "aardvark" <roselli at earthlink.net>
To: <thesite at lists.evolt.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [thesite] bad spam


> [snip]
>
> but, if the list were closed to non-subscribers, other than those who
> sub (which you  manually approve anyway, right?), how much
> spam would make it through?
>
> and if you blocked all HTML and attachment posts, instead of
> stripping and sending, how much spam would make it through?

+1 ... I still personally don't see the necessity for any of the @leo lists
to allow non-subscriber postings.

--
_ __/|   ___  ___ __ _________  "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned
\`O_o'  / _ \/ -_) // / __/ _ \  for Sega." -- Brodie, 'Mallrats'
=(_ _)=/_//_/\__/\_,_/_/  \___/ @ well.com :: William Anderson
   U - Ack! Phttpt! Thhbbt!     http://neuro.wasters.com/




More information about the thesite mailing list