[thelist] Fwd: Say good bye to free e-mail
Rachell Coe
rachell at coeville.com
Fri Feb 16 11:54:05 CST 2001
Hi All!
I received this email today, and although I am hoping that you are all
going to flame me for posting another urban legend :), I had to find out if
it was true or not -- and figured this was the best place to do it. Have
any of you heard anything about this?
>The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of
>the United States attempting to quietly push through legislation that will
>affect our use of the Internet.
>Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
>bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees." Bill 602P will permit
>the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every E-mail
>delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer
>would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
>Washington, DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this
>legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost
>revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
>$230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad
>campaign: "There is nothing like a letter." Since the average person
>received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the
>typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day-or over $180 per
>year-above and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would
>be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service
>they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is democracy and
>noninterference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail
>because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a
>letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is
>allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet
>in the United States. Our congressional representative, Tony Schnell?
>(Pat's note: would guess this is the original author's congressman) has even
>suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above
>and beyond the governments proposed E-mail charges
>Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story-the only
>exception being the Washingtonian - which called the idea of E-mail
>surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come"
>
>(March 6th, 1999 Editorial.)
More information about the thelist
mailing list