IIRC, the ODBC logging option does not store as much information as IIS Extended Logging to a text file. I'd check to see what fields are not supported by ODBC... From a performance point of view, I'd feel uneasy about the web server logging every activity to the database, especially on a site with heavy use. Just my £0.02... Ed Courtenay http://www.edcourtenay.co.uk "We've all heard that a million monkeys on a million keyboards would eventually come up with the entire works of Shakespeare - thanks to the Internet, we now know this isn't true...." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Mattheis" <gozz at gozz.com> To: <thelist at lists.evolt.org> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:27 PM Subject: [thelist] IIS ODBC logging > I'd like to use ODBC logging (to SQL Server) and am wondering if > anybody has any experience/opinions regarding how this might impact > the webserver's performance as opposed to just using a .log file. > > -- > > - Erik Mattheis > > Who reflects too much will accomplish little. > > (612) 827 3963 > > --------------------------------------- > For unsubscribe and other options, including > the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to: > http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !