[thelist] Lynx for Win2K?

R.Livsey r.livsey at cache-22.co.uk
Wed Nov 7 18:44:09 CST 2001

Wow, thanks for that.

I had never tested cache-22 in lynx and am surprised how well t
I need to look at some alt tag stuff, but apart from that it looks good!
Better than Netscape 4, which I really should get round to looking at!

Its always the case that you never have time for your own site!

Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on
Lead Programmer for the Tickle Group
Freelance work always welcome
[ PHP | Perl | mySQL | Java ]
w : cache-22.co.uk
e : R.Livsey at cache-22.co.uk
m : +447764 685 701
i : 37530949 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org 
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Dave Preston
> Sent: 07 November 2001 22:42
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: Re: [thelist] Lynx for Win2K?
> can't vouch for it since I try to use windows as little as possible...
> http://jim.spath.com/lynx_win32/
> you could also install cygwin which has lynx available...

good luck,


On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 01:52:17PM -0800, Bob Haroche wrote:
> The thread on alt tags got me thinking I'd like to test some of my 
> stuff in lynx.  My Win98 version of the browser doesn't work in Win2K.
> I know there are LOTS of versions out there, but can anyone point me 
> to a stable, binary version for Win2K?
> Regards,
> Bob Haroche

More information about the thelist mailing list