[thelist] Re: Why code for standards

[Bev Corwin]

Oh my.... that sounds like a big step.  Its an excellent idea,  but if there
are only a few of us,  it may be too big of a step.  I'm open to the idea,
but would like to see others interested, as well.   What are you thinking
with standards.org?  A forum for debate, information on standards orgs in
general, information on well designed / poorly designed standards orgs in
general,  various standards org links?   What is your idea,  and what is
*the list's* larger group idea on the goals, etc.?

Bev

----- Original Message -----
From: <martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com>
To: <thelist at lists.evolt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:40 AM
Subject: RE: [thelist] Re: Why code for standards


>
> Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
>
> -------------------- Start of message text --------------------
>
> Hi Bill, Bev
>
> How different would this be to http://www.webstandards.org/ ?
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>
>
>
> To:   thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject:  RE: [thelist] Re: Why code for standards
>
>
> I'll hold your names if you like, that way if anything comes of it through
> evolt, we'll have a start at a list we can hand over to whoever
> 'volunteers'
> to head it up. If nothing does come of it through evolt, we'll still have
a
> list of those interested and could perhaps get it off the ground in some
> other way. It would take a bit of organization, but is certainly doable.
> Anyone else interested can also let me know, I guess!?
>
> Tony:
>      > I agree.
>
>
> Bev:
>
>      > That would be productive....
>      >
>      > Great concept BH.
>
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Haenel" <bill at webmarketingworx.com>
> > Subject: RE: [thelist] Re: Why code for standards
> >
> > Seems like if someone really wanted to get involved, but could
> > not afford
> > to
> > do so on one's own, it would be worthwhile to get others who are in the
> > same
> > boat together to form an NFP that would collectively have the human,
> > financial and other resources to do so. Plus, as a group, they'd have a
> > better chance at organized missions, objectives and thoughts.
> >
> > Hmmmm....evolt?
> >
> > Anyone game?
>
>
> --------------------- End of message text --------------------
>
> This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
> individual, non-business capacity and is not on
> behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
>
> PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
> e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
> telecommunications systems.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you
received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
>
> --
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
>