[thelist] RE: CFMX / Dreamweaver MX

Sam Richardson sam at toolbox.co.nz
Tue Apr 30 18:30:01 CDT 2002

I doubt the list of features for either piece of software comes close to
what Dreamweaver offers.

I'm sick of people slagging off Dreamweaver and other visual based editors
for text based ones. Sure in the wrong hands the code Dreamweaver produces
is bad, but thats the same with any tool. But for things like complex nested
table editing and images I doubt you can get close to the speed of a visual

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Bennett" <richard.bennett at skynet.be>
To: <thelist at lists.evolt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [thelist] RE: CFMX / Dreamweaver MX

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Timothy Martens" <timfm at hawaii.rr.com>
> Subject: [thelist] RE: CFMX / Dreamweaver MX
> 62MBs? I mean honestly, is that not a tad bloated? I use HTML-Kit
> (http://www.chami.com/html-kit/) freeware. It's a whopping 2.9MBs!
> Aargh... 2.9mb? I use http://www.code-genie.com/ - also freeware, 541k
> All the HTML-Kit addins look fun though - I'll give it a look.
> Richard.
> --
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !

More information about the thelist mailing list