I didn't say that. I evaluate products based on how well they help me solve problems; not what company they come from. The rest of your message is standard marketing crap. Yes, I was wrong, Studio does support other source code control products including the one I use, CVS. However, does it only me to use CVS through studio effectively? No. Why? Because it was implemented using an API that assumed source code control would be implemented with the check in and out style of development. What do I do when I want to work with concurrent development? -Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] > On Behalf Of Raymond Camden > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:08 PM > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: RE: [thelist] Dw MX concensus > > So, in other words - you aren't happy with it because it happens to come > from M$? Obviously other products have used this standard - so it's not > alone. Also, again - you can configure Studio/HS to use other tools via > the command line. I think you are just being difficult now. Your > original statement was that if you didn't use VSS, than the SC > integration was worthless. That is wrong. The integration may not be > perfect, but it certainly _does_ work with other products. > > ======================================================================= > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia > > Email : jedimaster at macromedia.com > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org > > [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:48 PM > > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > > Subject: RE: [thelist] Dw MX concensus > > > > > > SO in other words, Microsoft published an interface API that feature > > matches VSS. You as a developer as welcome to implement that API for > > your own source code control system, but much the API might not make > > sense. > > > > VSS and CVS are very different from a methodology perspective. For > > example, there is no such thing as checking in or out of a file. Thus, > > offering this API doesn't really help me if I still have to use a CVS > > client to do my work. > > -- > For unsubscribe and other options, including > the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to: > http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !