From dashaver at dashaver.net Mon Jun 10 00:16:01 2002 From: dashaver at dashaver.net (David Shaver) Date: Mon Jun 10 00:16:01 2002 Subject: [thelist] DOC to HTML and a CMS In-Reply-To: <00ec01c20fa3$6a6b0680$0101c80a@hershel> Message-ID: <000001c2103a$c8934f00$6401a8c0@DHQ4GY01> What about HTML-Kit http://chami.com/ it does very well, is free but that many pages would take quite some time. David Shaver DaShaver Graphics & Web Design www.dashaver.com dashaver at dashaver.com -----Original Message----- From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Hershel Robinson Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 5:50 AM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: [thelist] DOC to HTML and a CMS I have a new client who has between 500 and 1000 articles in MS Word format. He wants to put them on a website. 1 Is there a utility to convert these into a usable HTML format automatically? Even if I were to hire a data entry person to convert by hand via MS Word's Save As Web Page feature, I am then only going to want the BODY of the thing because I want to build the CSS myself. Hmmm--I also don't know if the articles are full of formatting or not which I may have to remove. I do know someone who runs a fairly large site with a constantly-growing database of articles, and he puts new articles on the site via a secretary who cuts and pastes from MS Word into a private, online data-entry web page--this is an option but seems somewhat low tech. Any ideas are appreciated. 2 Is there a pre-fab CMS which would be appropriate for such a site? He does have the articles broken down into categories and subcategories, so I suppose it's actually only a matter of a small database, but I don't know if he plans to update the articles or to add a lot. The client is brand-new to the internet and doesn't know quite what he wants for this site just yet. Thanks, Hershel -- For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From gozz at gozz.com Mon Jun 10 00:26:00 2002 From: gozz at gozz.com (Erik Mattheis) Date: Mon Jun 10 00:26:00 2002 Subject: [thelist] Flash, usability, accessibility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: At 10:39 PM -0500 6/9/02, James S. Huggins (Evolt) wrote: > >========================== >>You're wrong. In the U.S., the constitution expressly charges the courts >>with interpreting the law. >>========================== > >While I would agree that the courts have the job of interpreting, I would >disagree that the constitution expressly grants that authority. Urlgmph ... it terrifies me that the White House holds similarly ludicrous opinions. option-command click on an app in the Dock to switch to that app, show all it's windows and hide all other windows. Transparent Dock allows you to modify the Dock in more ways than adjusting it's transparency: http://homepage.mac.com/kfkel/ I loved the FinderPop "change type/creator" Popplet - and would really like to find a Contextual Menuy Item that will change the type/creator -- __________________________________________ - Erik Mattheis (612) 377 2272 http://goZz.com/ Through June 15 9am - 3pm M-F: (952) 838 7698 __________________________________________ From nassarsa at redconcepts.net Mon Jun 10 00:41:01 2002 From: nassarsa at redconcepts.net (Samir M. Nassar) Date: Mon Jun 10 00:41:01 2002 Subject: [thelist] dangerous CSS, was: Netscape... why? In-Reply-To: References: <01c20f3d$66da4f00$15551dd1@rudy> <1023662936.1641.354.camel@yafa> Message-ID: <1023688791.2396.3.camel@yafa> > Sure, but how would I go about this? Would appreciate you sharing > some knowledge! Assuming that you are not facetious, assuming that you are serious and with the knowledge that there are much better CSS people on this list and off it, then you have the means to reach me. My email address pops up on every post I make. Samir M. Nassar RedConcepts.NET - http://redconcepts.net From chris at setmajer.com Mon Jun 10 00:42:00 2002 From: chris at setmajer.com (Chris Kaminski) Date: Mon Jun 10 00:42:00 2002 Subject: [thelist] dangerous CSS, was: Netscape... why? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Thus spake Erik Mattheis: > OK http://www.gozz.com/temporary/dangerous/styled.cfm - explanation > on the page which also allows you to have the page give you CSS > intended for another browser. Position: fixed is buggy or unsupported in just about every browser. Personally, I just avoid it. If you /really/ need to use it, some JS is probably necessary. It's one of only a few cases like that, though. As for your example page, I'm visiting in Mozilla and get a plain-jane version of the page, not the NN6 version. That points out the danger in JS browser sniffing: if you don't do it right, you'll wind up excluding browsers that you shouldn't. For a fix, try looking for 'Gecko' instead of 'Netscape' in your sniffer. chris.kaminski == ( design | code | analysis ) ------------------------------------------------------------ Know thyself? If I knew myself, I'd run away. ------------------------<< Johann Wolfgang von Goethe >> From chris at setmajer.com Mon Jun 10 00:52:00 2002 From: chris at setmajer.com (Chris Kaminski) Date: Mon Jun 10 00:52:00 2002 Subject: [thelist] Netscape 7 and In-Reply-To: <018801c20ffd$31d3c5a0$3c358141@mycomputer> Message-ID: Thus spake Laurel Nevans: > I may be wrong here, but isn't TITLE a fairly NEW element? I > don't think it was around, or widely implemented by the browsers > when the WAI guidelines were first written.