[thelist] CSS: Not using .css

[Joel Canfield]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > Depends on the browser. The extension should be irrelevent, but the
> > content type the server sends must be text/css for some browsers.
>
> Hmm... Does the type="text/css" tell the server how to send
> it, or the client how to interpret it? I don't want to set
> the MIME type of ALL my .asp files to "text/css"...

Server. That's why the standard file extension is .css - avoids this very
issue.

Any reason you want to use .asp for CSS files? or that you *dont'* want to
use .css for CSS files?

joel