Although its not neccessary, you could always partition the drive, and install 9.2 on one and 10.2 on the other. You could then either run X, run 9 in Classic Mode from X, or boot up from the 9 drive and run it entirely in 9. Of course, that would require some double installs of software, but it might be worth it. Adobe software is known to run slower in Classic mode, so if you have Adobe software that you wont be upgrading for X, it could make sense. .matt "Chris W. Parker" wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: matt s. [mailto:mspiegler at lightbulbpress.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:51 AM > > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > > Subject: Re: [thelist] [OT] upgrading Mac from OS9 to OSX, thoughts? > > > > > > what kind of Mac do you have? I've heard that pre-G3's can > > run into big > > trouble, and even the early G3's can be sluggish with OSX. > > it's a cube, but it came out when the cube was new. so i'm pretty sure > that makes it a G3. > > geoff mentioned that quarkxpress doesn't work with osx, and although > we've got version 5 (which might work, if geoff was referring to version > 4) we also need adobe distiller to work. and he says that doesn't. so it > looks like we'll just upgrade to the latest version of 9. (of course > going in order of all the previous updates.) > > any suggestions or comments about doing those upgrades? > > thanks, > chris. > -- > For unsubscribe and other options, including > the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to: > http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !