> -----Original Message----- > From: r937 at interlog.com [mailto:r937 at interlog.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:36 AM > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: re: [thelist] [CODE] bloated image src names > let me respond to jeff and see if that helps you'll never convert me! (that is, not until i find your ways more logical than mine.) (i have lots of questions in this email because, frankly, i'm intrigued by your idea, so hear me out.) although i do see your point i have to ask this possibly tired question of you, why have folders at all? why not just use a special naming convention throughout the whole os and do away with folders all together? surely your logic applies in any situation does it not? (in windows case) instead of looking for websites within x:\inetpub\ the os could just look for x:\inetpub_cbs_index.asp (as opposed to of course x:\inetpub\cbs\index.asp). and really, aren't folders files anyway? merely a logical representation as opposed to a physical one? and besides a few characters, what's the difference between src="images_home_rainbow.gif" and src="images/home/rainbow.gif". are they really anything more than two logical ways of representing the same thing? chris.