> I have to say like it or not all our web world's "have" to take aol into > consideration. From every stat at any site I've built aol browsers account > for over 50% of sessions for a day. Wow - those stats are quite far off from the norm. Have a look at http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp I personally never take account for aol users. I think I'm a little bias as I hate AOL... (c: DISCLAIMER: The information in this message may be confidential. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this e-mail and then delete it. An e-mail response to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. If you contact us by e-mail, we may store your name and address to facilitate communications. We do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message and any statements contained in this message are those of the individual and not The Virgin Cosmetics Company Limited. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses and whilst every effort has been made to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses, you should rely on your own virus checker and procedures. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that arise as a result of Internet transmission.