[thelist] xhtml vs html
Paul Bennett
paul at teltest.com
Tue Jul 22 20:55:31 CDT 2003
I was all happy and feeling good about myself coding merrily away in
xhtml strict when I read this (referenced from one of .jeffs posts I
believe):
"Sending xhtml as text/html is bad"
http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
Now I am having difficulty sleeping and when coworkers question my
dogmatic adherence to web and accessibility standards I have lost some
of the religious zeal I once had in expounding upon their virtues (the
standards, not my coworkers).
I wonder if the big brains on the list can offer their knowledge:
(1) Why would the w3c propose xhtml as the-next-big-thing(tm) if mr
hixie claims it is so nasty sent as html
(2) Are his claims valid? - IE (as in "for example", not "Internet
Explorer") , would the carnage he implies actually ensue if / when xhtml
is sent as xhtml/xml?
(3) If the w3c don't know what is going on, who does?
(4) Are sleeping pills the answer?
Many thanks,
--
------------------------------
Paul Bennett
Internet Developer
Teltest Electronic Design
------------------------------
Email: paul at teltest.com
Phone: 64 4 237 4557
Web: http://www.teltest.com
Wap: http://wap.teltest.com
More information about the thelist
mailing list