[thelist] Bold vs. Strong

[rudy]

>> i disagree, a bold style does not <i>necessarily</i> mean emphasis,
>> although i will concede that it may to many people
>
> Then how could you define it?

use B for bold, and use EM and STRONG for two levels of emphasis

yes, my previous post was largely sarcastic


> ... what's (again) the use of bold text with no meaning implied to the
boldism?

meaning?  does there have to be meaning?  it's just bold

> How do you define a text that is "going to be bold only visually but not
mean
> that this part of text is meant to effectively be put forward in my
discourse"?

how to define text that is only bold visually but has no emphasis?

B


rudy