[thelist] IE update

[dogfood]

Scott Brady wrote:

>> mozilla could be a special case, as it's a non-commercial project.
> 
> It's only different in that Eolas can't get as much money from them.  Just
> because it's now under the auspices of a non-profit foundation doesn't mean
> they can't be sued (possibly out of existence) to comply with the patent.

"We have from the beginning had a general policy of providing non-commercial
users royalty-free licenses. We expect to be paid for the commercial use of
our technologies. "
(eolas/michael doyle in an eWeek-interview
<http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1304252,00.asp>)
 
is mozilla "commercial use"?

-- 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Kai Pahl, Hamburg, Germany