[thelist] User-Agent for Aural Readers
Shawn K. Quinn
skquinn at xevious.kicks-ass.net
Wed Mar 31 18:11:42 CST 2004
On Wednesday 2004 March 31 14:44, Jeff Howden wrote:
[responding to Sam Carter who wrote:]
> > Do Aural Readers (like JAWS) leave a specific User-Agent
> > string?
>
> So, I'd say you can't rely on the user-agent string to identify aural
> browsers.
Indeed, it never was a good idea to rely on the User-Agent string for
anything. Proxies such as Junkbuster and Privoxy will filter or replace
User-Agent with something likely to be completely misleading (the last
version of Junkbuster I used would identify as Netscape Navigator 3 on
a Mac Classic). If I remember the HTTP specification right, User-Agent
is completely optional (at least through HTTP/1.1).
About the only use left for the User-Agent string is to identify search
engine robots, and even then only in combination with the originating
IP address.
--
Shawn K. Quinn
More information about the thelist
mailing list