Mike wrote: > For me it doesn't make sense anymore. The 'web safe' colors weren't that > safe anyway. Excerpted from "Death of the Websafe Color Palette?" by David Lehn and Hadley Stern: "We found that only 22 of the 216 colors we began with did not end up being shifted incorrectly in at least one viewing environment. So, it looks like we have roughly 22 colors that are really websafe" http://webmonkey.wired.com/webmonkey/00/37/index2a.html -- 3 e=sc^ (shiva at io.com) Earl Cooley III (the "other" Earl)