[thelist] pixel perfect requirements and web standards
Kasimir K
evolt at kasimir-k.fi
Mon Jun 6 03:02:59 CDT 2005
chris scribeva in 2005-06-05 23:26:
> So, I'm asking for a reality check -
>
> If you build mostly standards-based websites, how do you handle
> pixel-perfect requirements?
I change the requirements to non-pixel-perfect... I've been lucky enough
to always have had worked only with reasonable designers who are willing
to listen and learn. Even the print designers have agreed to give me a
couple pixels where I've needed those :-)
> what are your opinions regarding flash vs. image-based/table-based
> design?
IMHO:
Flash: can easily do things not possible (or very difficult) otherwise,
obviously leaves out users without flash, but if that price is
considered reasonable for what flash gives, then go for it.
Images-in-table layout: once left that behind can't now come up with any
reason why I would ever again use that (YMMV!).
> How do you communicate with a designer who truly does not understand the
> difference between a browser that renders a website and the photoshop
> document?
By asking them to navigate the site in Photoshop...
> The website audience is corporate and uses browsers and operating
> systems that are 3 years old at most - if their gear is 3 years old,
> they're likely to upgrade in the next year so backward compatibility is
> less of an issue.
To do pix-pref site actually has easier browser requirements, as pretty
old browsers can show images :-)
> Thanks for your thoughts
One more thought. If you want to get just this project done (so you can
have a second thought on collaborating with this designer again :-) you
could present him with two options:
- his way; he gets pixel perfect, you make each page one image with a
image map - very quick to do (and fortunately quick to forget)
- your way: he gives a couple pixels but gets a real website
HTH
.k
More information about the thelist
mailing list