[thelist] site check (accessibility)
Kasimir K
evolt at kasimir-k.fi
Wed Nov 2 04:20:23 CST 2005
> Kasimir K wrote:
>> I mean, does it really matter that much, if a navigation is ordered
>> or unordered list of links, or even definition list of available
>> pages... If it is a list of links
Ian Anderson scribeva in 2005-11-02 09:25:
> Well, the issue for a screen reader user is that if you use OL or UL for
> navigation lists:
...
> Both of these things make an ordered or unordered list of links
> preferable to a similar run of paras or whatever else.
Oh, I didn't mean that "list" or paragraphs would be good... I meant
that usually it's not worth arguing which one of UL, OL or even DL is
correct for a navigation list.
What I was after was that while we should endeavor to use semantic
markup, there is not a single, holly, unbreakable, beyond-any-doubt
source of those semantics... If one uses DL for navigation, W3C is not
going to come and strike a thunder bolt in the head, telling it must be
UL...
Instead of relying on rigid and absolute rules on semantics (which there
are none) we should use common sense.
Thanks for listening, feeling much better already :-)
.k
<tip type="javascript">
Sam Stephenson has created excellent Javascript framework Prototype
http://prototype.conio.net/
It provides incredibly usable little utilities, and robust ajax too.
While it is a great piece of JS, it's a bit lacking in documentation,
but fortunately Sergio Pereira has that base covered properly:
http://www.sergiopereira.com/articles/prototype.js.html
</tip>
More information about the thelist
mailing list