[thelist] Flash - what happens it plugin not installed?
John Dowdell
jdowdell at macromedia.com
Wed Nov 30 15:21:04 CST 2005
John Handelaar wrote:
>>I'd strongly recommend the 8.0 Player for security reasons. (The 7.x
>>versions were updated for antique operating systems which cannot use the
>>current Player.)
>
> I'd love to. I'm running Linux on a 2.6 kernel, which you'll
> agree hardly qualifies as 'antique'.
> Where can I download it, John? :)
Sorry, you got me on that one! ;-) I was *thinking* of writing "The 7.x
versions were updated for Classic Mac, Windows NT, Windows 95, and
current Linux versions," but then worried that the extra words would
make for confusion and follow-up questions, but instead.... ;-)
Here's the page with the range of engine ports:
http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/alternates/
The Macromedia Flash Player 7 for Linux has been updated with security
measures, but it's not yet matched to the Mac and Win 8.0 Players, for
two main reasons:
1) Media services are more difficult on Linux, so high-level engines
take more work:
http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/08/porting-flash-player-to-alternative.html
2) The Macromedia Flash Player 8.5, with a greatly improved logic
engine, is now in public alpha, so 8.0's timeframe will be short:
http://labs.macromedia.com/technologies/flashplayer8_5/
Summary: The Macromedia Flash Player for Linux still lags Mac and Win,
but security is updated properly on this distribution.
jd
--
John Dowdell . Macromedia Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
Weblog: http://www.macromedia.com/go/blog_jd
Aggregator: http://www.macromedia.com/go/weblogs
Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
More information about the thelist
mailing list