[thelist] Coding standards.... [headers]
Lee kowalkowski
lee.kowalkowski at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 11 10:09:41 CST 2006
On 11/12/06, Barney Carroll <barney at textmatters.com> wrote:
> 'Emergency'... 'level of importance'... Strange terms. A header is a
> header. I'm no professor of English but I'm very concerned at how
> abstract these perfectly ingrained human terms seem to be...
Wow, I'm rapidly losing you Barney! I'm no professor of English, but
e.g. means "for example". LOL! That would be a professor of Latin
anyway wouldn't it?
I think you're missing the point a little, it's not the meaning of
"heading" that we're discussing, as you rightly point out, we should
all pretty much fathom that. It's the meaning or application of the
levels 1 to 6 people seem to struggle with.
What do they mean? Well, desparately trying to pull my content back
to the topic of coding standards - it's up to the owner of the said
coding standards to define their meaning, and oversee their use.
There are some widespread opinions we have discussed for guidance:
I.e. "Only 1 level 1 heading.", and "Do not skip levels.".
--
Lee
More information about the thelist
mailing list