Hey list, I am going to be required to create an image map... I see no alternative, it's either that, or a million image slices and tables... I chose the image map. I feel an apprehension in my gut though, and I'm wondering if there's a reason for that. Maybe I heard something bad about image maps a long time ago, maybe it's because I haven't seen an image map on a modern site, maybe it's because the pizza I had last night was left out too long... I'm not sure. I am wondering - do you know of a valid reason NOT to use an imagemap? My first indicators are: search engines probably ignore them, and it looks like thick, heavy tag soup, but other than that, it's all fine and dandy. Accessibility problems, maybe? p.s. the reason I have to use an Image map is because I am converting a magazine page to a webpage - Please don't tell me that they aren't supposed to be webpages, because I am WELL aware - I have been contracted to do this, and the client wants it, so I am going to deliver. Thank You, Jon Hughes "Perfection is not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to take away."