On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, <rogerharness at comcast.net> wrote: > Would there be other reasons we should try to create multiple tables, or would it be simpler just to have the one large table? With only 4000 rows for this table, would speed be an issue at all, either way? > With so few rows, speed is not a concern. I would say keep it simple with a single table. One could make an argument for normalizing a little bit, but it's really not worth it in my opinion. -- Matt Warden Cincinnati, OH, USA http://mattwarden.com This email proudly and graciously contributes to entropy.