On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:28 PM, ben morrison <morrison.ben at gmail.com>wrote: > > unless we're defining 'spamming' in very different ways, I can't imagine > > that my having, for instance, joelcanfield.com and joeldcanfield.compoint > > to the same site as spamming. > > # What are the most common abuses a website owner is likely to encounter? > > clearly not speaking of the same thing, since my having two versions of my own name is obviously not 'abuse' or any sort of trickery. I used to have JoelTheWebGuy.com pointing at Spinhead.com because different people knew me each way. again, that hardly qualifies as abuse, having two legitimate names for the same website.