[Theforum] isaac's proposal
aardvark
roselli at earthlink.net
Mon Oct 22 18:02:47 CDT 2001
> From: Erika Meyer <emeyer at lclark.edu>
>
> >A future for evolt.org
> >http://members.evolt.org/isaac/evolt/future.html
>
> I don't know how to articulate exactly, but the lack of any sort of
> unified steering group is disconcerting to me. I am accustomed to
> working in situations where there is a single group or rotating
> members (BoD or exec committee) -- a core group at the helm, everyone
> in certain roles.
i tend to agree... a legal NFP (not-for-profit, US 501c) needs some
formalized board... *how* we build it is the question...
> And meetings.
>
> It seems odd to establish a BOD and at the same time make them only
> marginally relevant.
a BoD in an NFP needs to exist... how they are chosen or who
they represent is mutable... how mutable, i don't know...
> >The consensus is that we have a lean BoD restricted to handling legal
> >and financial stuff, but not one that slows down community progress.
>
> Financial stuff and "community progress" are linked. And "community
> progress" can be defined many ways. Bigger not always better. The
> bigger they come the bigger they fall. Or something like that.
legal/financial should be viewed as the stuff the official BoD of the
NFP has to worry about...
community stuff should be handled elsewhere...
> The looseness of this proposal is troublesome. For example:
> <q>
> >I'd suggest that we work on establishing a voting membership.
> </q>
>
> How? Who decides? How do things get done? How do we piggyback?
good questions... questions i'd like to see answered here...
> What is wrong with the current structure? Why couldn't we work
> within the bylaws already accepted?
the current structure has 20+ Board of Director (BoD) members, all
with varying degrees of active participation, time restraints, outside
lives, etc., all of which combined to make BoD meetings *very*
difficult to coordinate, and even more difficult to establish good
turnout...
a traditional BoD model with 20+ people all over the world doesn't
seem to fit too well, otherwise we would have had more than one
meeting as a BoD, and we would have had 100% participation...
a smaller BoD might make that a possibility... as well as other
possible solutions...
> Could it be that a "real" nonprofit cannot operate this way? That we
> need to have physical proximity of some sort?
who knows... i don't, not yet...
More information about the theforum
mailing list