On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Michele Foster wrote: > Let's indicate exactly WHO will be reviewing the survey results, please. I > don't know that this has been decided... some possible options include: people are discussing haveing a small group of people actually reviewing the hardcore data, i dont think we have all the details worked out yet though.. > "Your response to this survey will be given complete confidentiality. You > > I'm not sure "complete confidentiality" is the correct term to use here, how about '.. will be not be used in an in-appropriate manner(sold to marketers, spam, public viewing, etc)' or something like that? > Be careful with this .. who's going to be making the phone calls? I'd ya, reworded it. > > General: > > "3. What part of evolt.org do you use the most? > www.evolt.org - articles, how-to, content > lists.evolt.org - mailing lists, tips, archives > browsers.evolt.org - browser archive > directory.evolt.org - web related links > members.evolt.org - member hosting, development > equal utilization" > > Any change this can be a rated question. i.e. rating of five, with one > being the most used, five being the least used? ohhh, then its like choosing between saphire and beefeater gin! i love them *both* and don't think i could choose a favorite :) > "4. How long have you been involved with evolt.org? > I've never registered " > > Registered for what? Keep in mind many people have mentioned in the past ya, i didn't know how to phrase that. how to we convey 'involvment' in absolute terms? > weo: > > "2. How often to you read the www.evolt.org site?" > > Can we add "When the Headline notice goes to thelist?" indicating new > content has been posted? i think this should go in a different question maybe.. like 'what brings you to the evolt.org site most often' it doesn't seem to fit in the context with 'often, never' etc.. > Can this be for just thelist, specifically? (Or is it possible to add which > list the person is filling the question out for, and if they are subbed to > more than one list, they can fill the question out the appropriate number of > times?) someone else mentioned this, and ya, that'll pobably happen > That's all for me ... thanks for the feedback! :) .djc.