> A few suggestions have been made which still need to be incorporated into > the final design including: > > * Adding more space/padding between the graphical bar and the radio buttons > to select the rating. > * Modifying the wording for clarity. > * Something else wrt the table's border, but I don't remember what that was. > ;) > * Adding to the CSS files, a class for the colour of the bar. > > Anyway, what say everyone .. > > (1) Do we add the graphical representation of the ratings? +1 with listed changes > (2) And, part two of this .. do we use the "new" rating scale of poor, > average, good, very good, excellent? (A "-1" to this indicates we keep the > original rating scale of bad, poor, okay, good, great!!). aard makes a good point about the ratings change. I do like the new terms better than the old terms though and the rating scale isn't changing, only the words defining each segment ( ex: 1-1.9 now is "bad", would become "poor" --- 2-2.9 now is "poor", would become "average"). +1 if my above understanding is correct.