Ron Yes, to the best of my knowledge, your interpretation is correct. (Vote recorded.) Mich | > (2) And, part two of this .. do we use the "new" rating scale of poor, | > average, good, very good, excellent? (A "-1" to this indicates we keep the | > original rating scale of bad, poor, okay, good, great!!). | | aard makes a good point about the ratings change. I do like the new terms | better than the old terms though and the rating scale isn't changing, only the | words defining each segment ( ex: 1-1.9 now is "bad", would become "poor" --- | 2-2.9 now is "poor", would become "average"). | | +1 if my above understanding is correct.