On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Elfur Logadottir wrote: > ah, but this group as a whole is open to everyone ... and that's where we > differ. I think it should be those that are already 'trusted' as you > mention above. basically i think we should add those already 'trusted' to > the admin group for day to day administration (most persons on this list > are trusted, but while i don't know exactly who is on this list i can't say > all). heh. thanks for catching that elfur, it is what i meant to say. 'trusted people' in an open forum is what i think is best. its been a long week ;) > that way you first start viewing your opinion by subscribing to theforum > and then you get added responsibilty by being approved to admin if you want > to be an admin. it takes more than being on the admin list to be an 'admin' in my mind. > so do you want theforum in general, as it is at any given time, to be the > one to decide who is trusted? or am i misunderstanding something? the 'trusted people in an open forum' idea. the open forum of that being this list. .djc.