[Theforum] PLEASE READ Article editing -- what are the sides??
A. Erickson
amanda at gawow.com
Mon Dec 3 16:12:10 CST 2001
> That's how I hear it. If you're tallying, I'm 2.
>
> If you're tally-hoeing, I'm a 44 regular.
LOL!
A vote is fine if people want to. I was going to propose that next but
wanted to make sure that I had the two proposals down right or if there
was a third that I missed.
If we can nail this down then we can vote on a direction. Then we can
figure out the 'how' the works.
- amanda
> > Okay, here's what I want to do -- I'd like to get consensus on the
> > article editing issue. I want to focus on the what and not
> the how or
> > the why. Let's just boil it down here. It seems to me that
> we have two
> > core proposals on the table on article editing.
> >
> >
> > 1. Free
> >
> > 2. Limited
> >
> >
> > The 'Free' proposal is for giving all current forum subscribers the
> > ability to edit articles.
> >
> > The 'Limited' proposal is for giving all current forum
> subscribers the
> > ability to join a group of editors and they will have the
> ability to
> > edit articles.
> >
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > - amanda
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > amanda at gawow.com + http://gawow.com
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theforum
> It's functional, not aesthetic.
>
More information about the theforum
mailing list