[Theforum] Evolt redesign - user choice

.jeff jeff at members.evolt.org
Tue Jan 22 12:07:32 CST 2002


rudy,

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: rudy
>
> >http://test.evolt.org/article/theforum/17/16286/
> >
> >support for this is spotty
>
> ayup
>
> win95 ie5  there's no vertical scrollbar in them boxen
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

no vertical scrollbar?  i should hope not -- that's what i was trying to
show.  ;p

the only scrollbars you should see are horizontal ones, and then only when
they're needed.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> > how are other sites dealing with long lines of
> > <pre></pre> text?
>
> break up the lines where desired, and insert a
> "continued" character (could be a 16x16 image,
> those work well)
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

ok, this is definitely the "if we could do anything" solution.  i'd love to
do it but know it'll chew up a bunch of processing power for each article
display.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> <pre>
> &lt;OBJECT
>    classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"
>    codebase="http://active.macromedia.com/flash2/
> ==>     cabs/swflash.cab#version=4,0,0,0"
>    ID=cands_intro WIDTH=290 HEIGHT=320
>    longdesc="webpage.html" accesskey="6"&gt;
> </pre>
>
> note the syntax allows breaks between attribute/value
> pairs, [...]
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

yes, i see that which makes it just that much more difficult to implement,
but the ultimate way to go.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> but not within the url, [...]
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

so then if there's a really long url posted it still breaks the layout?  or,
do we put some sort of cap on the width and if it overflows, it puts in a
horizontal scrollbar?

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> not a clean cut & paste operation like the textarea, but
> looks better than most textareas
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

it could be a simple cut-n-paste operation though if we used a numbering
column for row numbers and placed the line continuation character in that
column and the text in a column to the right.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> and a lot of the code we're putting into textareas
> wouldn't need the continuation character in a
> <pre>..</pre> block at all, being short enough not to
> kill the layout
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

ok, but here's the problem.  since we support most any screen resolution,
where do we define the point at which a continuation character gets
inserted?  70 characters or more on a line?  40 characters or more?  the
number of characters should be somewhat related to the user's browser window
width to be most useful.

.jeff

http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/






More information about the theforum mailing list