IMO, let's get the high level requirements sorted. So far we've got: http://lists.evolt.org/theforumarchive/Week-of-Mon-20030811/000182.html (also at http://wiki.evolt.org/wiki with some expansion on the i18n bit) to which I'd also like to add the IA expansion of: http://lists.evolt.org/theforumarchive/Week-of-Mon-20030811/000261.html When that's done, along with a design direction (I think the tweaking we've been doing goes past that) then we can drop it to the individual groups to set requirements and desdev to define how they're to be achieved. I *would* like to see any decisions on recommended applications to run evolters etc back here and/or steering, assuming we're in agreement with: http://lists.evolt.org/theforumarchive/Week-of-Mon-20030811/000223.html or similar. Cheers Martin Tara Cleveland wrote: To: cc: Subject: Re: [theforum] movement for redesign Can we start up a more focussed discussion on desdev or something? Or shall we wait until more decisions are finalised on theforum?