[theforum] Re: Update

[Garrett Coakley]

On Wednesday, December 8, 2004  @481, Garrett Coakley wrote:

[snip]

>Now that we have that information, we can come back to the 3col vs 2col
>discussion and where we lay out those elements. I'm of a mind to stick to
>2cols as per the current site just for the sake of speed of build, and
>then have an architectural discussion in the new year. 

[snip]

>I'd like to see a decision reached by Friday at the latest. 


I got caught up on a deadline, so everyone got two extra days. I take it
from the silence to my original email that there are no problems with
going with 2 columns now and revisiting the issue after the move?

Good.

G.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Work : http://www.gencon.co.uk
         Play : http://polytechnic.co.uk
         Learn: http://evolt.org