[theforum] Allowable tags in content in new site
William Anderson
neuro at well.com
Sat Feb 19 04:47:10 CST 2005
Jeff Howden wrote:
> Martin,
>
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>From: Martin Burns
>>
>>1) Auto-add all the para tags, and severely limit the
>> acceptable HTML to really innocuous stuff
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>
> Bad idea. Authors should submit with proper markup.
+1 - we can't be seen to be mollycoddling our *web-developer* community!
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>2) limit the tags to those in our code guide.
>>
>>[...]
>>
>><b>
>><i>
>><hr>
>><br>
>>and added <q>
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>
> Don't remove <br> or <hr>. There are both useful in articles and may be
> necessary to illustrate a point.
+1, although munging them to proper xhtml may be useful.
--
_ __/| William Anderson | "There's something about records which is
\`O_o' neuro at well dot com | really satisfying."
=(_ _)= http://neuro.me.uk/ | -- John Peel (1939 - 2004)
U - Thhbt! GPG 0xFA5F1100 |
More information about the theforum
mailing list