[theforum] Design Competition: last chance for comment
Martin Burns
martin at easyweb.co.uk
Wed Mar 1 10:46:18 CST 2006
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:08:13 +0000, John Handelaar <john at userfrenzy.com> wrote:
> Martin Burns wrote:
>> On 28 Feb 2006, at 14:31, Sarah Adams wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>I'm assuming by the silence that no-one's got any serious objections
>>>>to this.
>>>>
>>>>If that's still the case on Friday (probably late evening UK time),
>>>>I'll post this to thelist/thechat and write it up for weo.
>
> It's not clear from the wiki page what
> "Adherence to evolt.org branding" means
> in practice.
>
> We should clarify. Not least so that *I*
> know what that's supposed to mean these days.
Actually, I quite like it a bit undefined and subjective -
"does it feel like evolt..?" kind of openness, which as entrants
are prolly evolters, may and possibly should vary from person to
person.
That said, branding considerations are:
1) Don't mess with the logo - not that we have original source files for it anyway
2) Some kind of black top bar to echo where we've been for over half a decade.
3) Unless you're proposing something *else* to mark out the different sites, weo has
a blue accent colour. Precise blue is prolly up for grabs.
Cheers
Martin
--
"Names, once they are in common use | Spammers: Send me email to
quickly become mere sounds, their | -> yumyum at easyweb.co.uk
etymology being buried, like so many | my filter. Currently killing over
of the earth's marvels, beneath the | 99.9% of all known spams stone dead.
dust of habit." - Salman Rushdie | http://nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam
More information about the theforum
mailing list