[theforum] Vote Request

[William Anderson]

Alan Lloyd [www-ss.com] wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> But it also seemed (by viewing archives anyway) to be what started the
> slide. Now maybe that is overstating it a bit, but it *has* had an effect.
> 
> We need a private place to discuses some private things as you say. But
> we don't need 5 other lists to do it. Surely between theforum, sysadmin
> and content we can cover everything without to much fragmentation.
> 
> Perhaps a compromise?

I don't see the point.  The existence and staleness of a list should not
necessitate its removal.  If we all agree to commence proposals,
discussions, etc here on theforum, the objective is achieved, and we can
move on.  I don't see a need for change in the way we have our lists
organised; you're thinking to small, to narrow.

Concentrate on the organisation itself, not a particular element of its
implementation.  *Nothing is happening* is the primary issue.  Discussion on
irc *and* here on the list will help that, even if it's a meta discussion as
we're having now.

Let's not vote, let's not argue, let's just do!

-- 
_ __/|  William Anderson      |  Tim: Your cheese game is strong.
\`O_o'  neuro at well dot com | Zane: My cheese game. It's all about the
=(_ _)= http://neuro.me.uk/   |       cheese platter.
   U  - Thhbt! GPG 0xFA5F1100 | -- Tim Westwood, Zane Lowe, R1, Dec 2005