Joel D Canfield agreeably noted: > -- We could 'freeze' it and not allow any further updates until we > come up with a better scheme for allowing updates. >>>I'm thinking that's a 'bingo' there, Cap'n Ron. Arrrrrrrrr, Laddie! ... And that's where them scurvy scalawag ideas have walked the procedural plank in the past. We needs a way to agree ta it, be it a vote (raise yer hooks) or a duel to the ouch (death is soooooo overrated). Then we needs a salty dog to rip out the 'suggest a link' code on the test deck. Then we needs some testy testers to inspect the deck a'prior to impl'm'n't'ng! >>> . . . but since I'm really a displaced Irishman, you didn't mean me) Mooo!  RonL.  I believe it's from an old Bloom County cartoon where some character replys, with theatrically exaggerated disdain and a dismissive hand wave, "Mooo. Baaa. Pffft. Whatever." Seemed rather royal in a way.  You know I couldn't let 19-Sep go by without an "Avast" or two.