[thelist] XML vs HTML for Content Management
Mike King
mike.king at redroom.co.uk
Thu Nov 30 08:17:26 CST 2000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 12:38 30/11/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Don't you still have an app server overhead there..?
>
>I realise that the ASP engine is pretty tightly bound into
>IIS, and that simple includes are going to be better than
>db calls, but if you're *really* worried about performance,
>you're still losing time.
Granted, but it's a happy medium.
You get the advantages from no huge calls to a db... but elements, like
basic personalisation, can still be taken care of.
It could also be used for some pages and not others. If some content only
changes once every 3 months (or some other arbitrary time frame) why have
it created at every call?
It's a real YMMV idea, but I've found it works well.
Cheers
mk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOiZhmPoJZSzUdy33EQLeeQCfXqdw7MgwwJP0mhisRn7/XF5bw0YAoJ73
GjhRQzSlYxCfLPoc4bRvr3EB
=5D9+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the thelist
mailing list