[thelist] Non-Deprecated HTML Presentational Elements (was, C SS Font Sizes)

[Joe Crawford]

Calum I Mac Leod wrote:
> I also don't go along with Joe's argument (that W3C spec's are kludges), not
> because it's not true (it is, just look at the conflicts between SGML and
> HTML), but because HTML 4 Strict and Transitional are supposed to allow us
> all the horrid old presentational HTML stuff in Transitional, if we want it,
> so why have them in Strict?

For the record:
I never said that w3c specs are kludges. I said that they are moving
targets. The use of the term 'kludge' would imply a qualitative
judgement on my part. No such judgement emanated from me.

Your other comments are interesting.

	- Joe
--
Joe Crawford ||||||||||||||       mailto:jcrawford at avencom.com
||||||||||||||||||||||||             http://www.avencom.com
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||      Avencom: Set Your Sites Higher