[thelist] Re: Why code for standards

martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com
Mon Feb 4 12:01:23 CST 2002


Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers

-------------------- Start of message text --------------------

Time for a bit of devil's advocacy:

Why do we want to code for standards? Is it to avoid the
extra work involved in multiple sets of coding plus the
intelligence to serve the correct one?

Now I can see the point of that in a booming economy when
we're all overloaded with work, but that's not the case anymore.

Times are hard. We're short of work. We have to work our backsides
off to find it.

So why are we turning away free work handed to us on a plate? And
more - there are a lot of people who *only* know standards (or one
browser). Knowing how to code round a lot of them is a competitive
advantage - sell it to your clients as a 'must have' requirement for a
professional, and you lock out your competitors.

Who wouldn't do that?

Cheers
Martin




Please respond to thelist at lists.evolt.org

Sent by:  thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org

To:   thelist at lists.evolt.org
cc:


Subject:  Re: [thelist] Re: Why code for standards


> But in the end you code for browsers, not for
> standards (though the two increasingly overlap).

But I think that's exactly it, we are tired of coding
for browsers. We want standards. We want to code for
standards.



--------------------- End of message text --------------------

This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.




More information about the thelist mailing list