[thelist] Re: Why code for standards

Bev Corwin bev at enso-company.com
Mon Feb 4 18:21:00 CST 2002


There are many kinds of blindness in this world....

When an organization is  simply limited to corporations willing to pay a
hefty price,  far more than any small business would ever pay... or a
school,  or a student ... how can it be anything else but an extension of
them (the corporations)?

Speaking of improperly worded statements:  it is not a question of semantics
here,  it is a question of actions, prudish actions.... and you prove my
point well with your statements....  a fine example of prudishness.

Bev

----- Original Message -----
From: <jay.blanchard at thermon.com>
To: <thelist at lists.evolt.org>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: [thelist] Re: Why code for standards
...
> <tip topic="semantics/documentation">
> Be careful when wording questions in a discussion about semantics. One
> improperly worded statement can come back to bite you in the keester, more
> than once, and really hard. Learning to document properly will encourage
> you to be language specific, leaving no doubt as to the question or the
answer.
> </tip>






More information about the thelist mailing list