[thelist] PWS as a Webserver

[Chris Lott]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

How is Apache "overkill" when it uses less memory, is a smaller download,
and is easier to configure? I don't get that. The right tool for the job,
sure, and if one is using PWS and it is meeting his or her needs, then by
all means keep at it. But "overkill" hardly seems like an argument (either
way). Obviously, if some server side technology demands a particular
server, whether that be ASP and PWS or mod_perl and apache (just to name a
couple of examples), then your decision is made for you.

And please, PLEASE keep people away fro Frontpage. I am not against all GUI
editors-- just that one :)

c

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt - KeyID: 0x51046CFD - http://www.chrislott.org/geek/pgp/

iQA/AwUBPHmIJ9aLYehRBGz9EQKe5gCgthcJ+N+Nr5h2t+9O4W3jMO3lpq0An09c
zMeNvd+WNAU9eUZNrXwVrAcS
=Uafu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----