[thelist] developer ethics?
stout at stoutstreet.com
stout at stoutstreet.com
Wed Mar 6 12:26:01 CST 2002
I second this opinion. Self-motivation and the desire to continue learning are vital and, unfortunately, very hard to quantify.
How many people certify.....then re-certify the next year when standards/programs/industry changes? It's like Steven Wright taking his dog for a walk around the world, turning to him at the end and saying 'Now you're done.'
>"the piper of oz" <thepiper at australia.edu> wrote:
>>i'd sure rather have an applicant with a cert than
>>someone who used to be a plumber or uses WYSIWYGs only.
>What makes you think that someone with a cert won't use WYSIWYGs only?
>Certs, or cert testing, anyway, will be sold. You can't fail too many people and expect to keep bringing the fees in. So it isn't too likely that a cert will exclude bad HTML creators.
>As someone self-taught, sometimes this talk alarms me, a bit. I _was_ a plumber, of sorts, in the Navy (a nuclear plumber ;) ). Then I was tech writer, of sorts. Now I'm a tech writer who often makes web pages.
>I have seen very little connection between who has received formal training and who understands web standards, proper semantic markup, etc. Perhaps the opposite; those who are self motivated and taught seem to be ahead of the curve, and genuinely interested in learning.
>I just don't think a 'guild' would be very helpful.
>Just my 2 cents.
>Greg Holmes
-----------------------------------------
could use a job.......
http://www.iampms.com/
More information about the thelist
mailing list