[thelist] Copyrights
AJ Dalton
a_j_dalton at hotmail.com
Mon May 13 16:47:01 CDT 2002
Hi all -
I thought I'd write this before I get anyone else confused on the issue.
First of all, I'm not an attorney - so I couch everything with "I believe
that ..." - since I have to rely on others in this area. Plus, in "internet
land" things may be changing. I'm only raising a 'red warning flag' on
this.
My understanding agrees with the comments that an employee's work belongs to
the employer, by default. Also, I believe that those are correct by saying
that an original and autonomous work is copyrighted at time of creation
(though proof of authorship is helpful). So, I have little doubt that a
website that you created for yourself is yours.
But, at least according to one attorney, courts may start treating
Contract-Built Websites differently. Just as an FYI, I will pass this along
FWIT (For What It's Worth): I came by this on a plane on the East coast,
about a year ago, when I sat next to an attorney who was building a practice
on Internet Law (or lack of it). In the course of the discussion, he noted
that a recent copyright case ruled for the business which contracted for the
website. Copyright was not mentioned in the contract nor noted on the
website.
As best as I remember, he said that: a company contracted for the web site,
participated in and approved the design and content. Later, the web builder
built an almost identical site for a competitor. A suit followed. The web
builder maintained that he owned the copyright and could do as he wished
with it.
The court found that: 1/ The contract was for a product and the product was
the website (delivered and paid for), 2/ The company participated
substantially on the design and content of the product and approved the
final design and content, and as such - 3/ This was not an autonomous,
original, and exclusive work by the web builder. The web builder lost. [My
paraphrasing of what he said].
Is this the law? I don't know. A lot is up for grabs in the internet.
But, my bottom line is: I'd state clearly in the contract what the
copyright is, and then clearly publish the copyright on the site. Then the
whole issue is a non-issue. Otherwise, "legal-land" can become a quagmire.
AJ
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
More information about the thelist
mailing list