[thelist] W3C CSS Validator. Am I missing something?

[Internet Racer]

Just as an aside question:  does it degrade the performance if you fill in
all the fields even if it's redundant?

BODY { color: #121212; font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, Geneva,
sans-serif; font-size:  9pt; font-weight: none; text-decoration: none;
margin-top: 2px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 2px;
background-color: #ffffff; }

A { color: #306898; font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, Geneva,
sans-serif; font-size:  9pt; font-weight: none; text-decoration:
underline; }

TD { color: #121212; font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, Geneva,
sans-serif; font-size:  9pt; font-weight: none; text-decoration: none; }



-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Daniel Medley
Sent: July 13, 2002 10:31 AM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] W3C CSS Validator. Am I missing something?



> Are those warnings or errors? I thought they came up as warnings on the
> validator.
>
> Basically it means that it is good practise to always set a color:
property
> whenever you set a background-color. If you want to keep the same color
> throughout just chuck in "color: inherit" and the warnings will go away.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon Willison
You are right, they are warnings, not errors. Since they are indeed a
different color than the main background color so I will have to keep them
as they are.

Thanks for the insight,
Daniel


--
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !