[thelist] web page extensions

[Joel Konkle-Parker]

Either that, or they have .htaccess files in each directory with "DirectoryIndex
thisfilename.html" in them.

-joel

Quoting Mark Joslyn <mark.joslyn at solimarsystems.com>:

> So companies that implement this system have a lot of files named
> index.html
> or default.html (one for each directory)? That seems a little confusing
> to
> keep naming files the same name.
>
> Am I way off base here?
>
> Thanks,
>
> markJ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Norman Bunn
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 1:53 PM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: Re: [thelist] web page extensions
>
>
> The last "no extension" entry is a directory name, not a file name.
> When
> presented with just a directory, the web server will access a default
> filename.  Depending on the server setup, this can be index.html,
> index.htm, index.shtml, default.htm, default.html, index.cgi,
> default.asp...
>
> Norman
> www.craftedsolutions.com
>
> At 01:42 PM 7/25/2002, Mark Joslyn wrote:
> >I was just wondering how companies use landing pages in
> advertisements
> >without a .html, .htm, etc. extension at the end.
> >
> >My question: How do you set up your pages and/or directory structure
> to
> take
> >advantage of being able to use links without extensions? This is
> really
> >useful in marketing/advertising pieces.
>
> --
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
> --
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ballsome.com