From evolt at muinar.com Mon Nov 3 02:06:32 2003 From: evolt at muinar.com (muinar) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:06:32 +0100 Subject: [thelist] Page Size; Fixed Layout In-Reply-To: <2c19c82bed17.2bed172c19c8@optonline.net> Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20031103085754.00a1bec0@mail.muinar.com> At 23:03 02.11.03, you wrote: >I should have specified, I have been given a site that has a Fixed layout. > >Given this piece of valuable information, is it a good idea to design >pages at 1024? Hi Paul In this case I would definitely code for 800 and make it look good at 1024 (left-aligned or centered). Otherwise users at 800 won't see the whole page or would have to scroll horizontally. Unless more than 80 percent of your userbase is at 1024... which is unlikely. Depending on your audience, it should be something between 30 and 60 percent. Mike From kilimajer at webglobe.sk Mon Nov 3 02:55:04 2003 From: kilimajer at webglobe.sk (Marek Kilimajer) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:55:04 +0100 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript Message-ID: <3FA617E8.1080401@webglobe.sk> Give the form the same id and name. John Corry wrote: > I am at wit's end. > > I hardly ever work with JS, but am just trying to do something so simple > it's funny: > > I want to submit a form when a user clicks a link. > > Why? So I can display the form submit mechanism outside the
tags. > > I made a function to do the submission: > > > And I have a form: > id="updateForm"> > > And I have a link: > > > And when I click the link, the mozilla javascript console tells me: > Error: window.document.updateForm.submit is not a function > Source File: http://nishiyama.localhost.com/admin/update_form.php# > Line: 18 > > WTF!? > Submit() is not a method of a form object? > Window.document.updateForm is not a form object? > > What is going on? I went through 10 stupid javascript tutorials and this is > how ALL OF THEM referenced the form! Why won't it work for me? Yes, I have > javascript on. > > /me is so frustrated he can hardly stand it... > > Thanks if you can help me see the stupidity I'm missing, > > John Corry > > > From jeff at jeffhowden.com Mon Nov 3 02:59:11 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:59:11 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <20031103042302.1973.32079@hm-mx1b.solinus.com> Message-ID: ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: John Corry > > A form object's submit() method will not work if the > form has an input named 'submit'. > > Change the name of the submit button and you've got it. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< the submit() method is the lazy developer's way out of doing something the right way. never use it. instead, consider an alternate means of submitting the form, like say, including a submit button that *everyone* can use. beware of the submit() method. it won't cause the onsubmit event handler to fire. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From jeff at jeffhowden.com Mon Nov 3 03:02:49 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:02:49 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <20031103035314.1104.277@hm-mx1b.solinus.com> Message-ID: john, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: John Corry > > Accessibility is not an issue in the long term... [...] ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< accessibility should *always* be an issue, especially with something that can so easily be done in a more accessible fashion. i'll agree that there are times when budget, expediency, etc. that accessibility gets a lower priority than usual, but i don't see how that's the case here. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > and even if it were, right now I'm just trying to make > the form submit. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< submit buttons work great. you mentioned that you want the submit somewhere else in the html and that necessitates it being outside the block. maybe there's a way around that that'll still leave the form usable to non-js users. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From kris at midtempo.net Mon Nov 3 03:34:09 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:34:09 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [php] preg_replace text links? Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> hi, i'm trying to get my head around some regex in php which i've lifted (with only minor understanding) from "mastering regex expressions". what i'm trying to do is scan user submitted text (parsed through htmlspecialchars) pick out any links and link 'em up. the starting pattern (from the book) is at http://www.midtempo.net/regex.html but it just gives me "Warning: Delimiter must not be alphanumeric or backslash". i've tried countless additions of backslashes and googled for help, all to no avail... has anyone done this before? if so, where am i going wrong? tia k From jan at artmiks.nl Mon Nov 3 03:53:42 2003 From: jan at artmiks.nl (jan guichelaar [artmiks]) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:53:42 +0100 Subject: [thelist] deleting php vars References: <002501c39ef2$d6285eb0$1001a8c0@janpc> <3FA17B23.5000100@teltest.com> Message-ID: <01c301c3a1f0$5d596af0$1001a8c0@janpc> unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['var_name']); looks promising, but when i refresh the page, the vars are still there, Still dont know how to prevent people to refresh the page and thus executing the same php-code with the same vars twice. :-( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Bennett" To: Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:57 PM Subject: Re: [thelist] deleting php vars > jan guichelaar [artmiks] wrote: > > >thanx, but this doesn't work with vars from a post/get method, > >only with vars you set in the php-page itself > > > > > > > ok, not 100% sure what you are trying to do, but have you tried: > unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['var_name']); > ? > > This makes php 'forget' as it removes both the variable data and name > from script processing > ------------------- > Paul Bennett > http://www.clicksave.co.nz > For your free report: > "10 time-killing web development mistakes and how to avoid them" > send an email to: > bennettpr at getresponse.com > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > From kverens at contactjuggling.org Mon Nov 3 06:01:11 2003 From: kverens at contactjuggling.org (Kae Verens) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:01:11 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [php] preg_replace text links? In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <3FA64387.4020805@contactjuggling.org> kris burford wrote: > hi, > > i'm trying to get my head around some regex in php which i've lifted > (with only minor understanding) from "mastering regex expressions". > > what i'm trying to do is scan user submitted text (parsed through > htmlspecialchars) pick out any links and link 'em up. > > the starting pattern (from the book) is at > http://www.midtempo.net/regex.html but it just gives me "Warning: > Delimiter must not be alphanumeric or backslash". i've tried countless > additions of backslashes and googled for help, all to no avail... > > has anyone done this before? if so, where am i going wrong? I use something like this (excerpt): $a=preg_replace("/(http:\/\/|www|[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.|[a-zA-Z0-9\.-]+@)(([a-zA-Z0-9-][a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9-\.\/\_\?\%\#\&\=\;\~\!\(\)]+)/","
\\1\\2",$a); that extracts most links and creates HTML links. I use the following to allow more control: $a=preg_replace("/\[]*>)[^<]*<\/a>\|(.*?)\]/" , "" ,$a); lets the user write a link as [http://contactjuggling.org/|contact juggling], and that then links the words "contact juggling" to http://contactjuggling.org/ Kae From jon at laughing-buddha.net Mon Nov 3 04:17:13 2003 From: jon at laughing-buddha.net (Jon Haworth) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:17:13 -0000 Subject: [thelist] deleting php vars References: <002501c39ef2$d6285eb0$1001a8c0@janpc><3FA17B23.5000100@teltest.com> <01c301c3a1f0$5d596af0$1001a8c0@janpc> Message-ID: <008d01c3a1f3$a8bbca30$050a0a0a@eris> Hi Jan, > unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['var_name']); > > looks promising, but when i refresh the page, the vars are > still there, Still dont know how to prevent people to refresh > the page and thus executing the same php-code with the > same vars twice. :-( How about including a hidden field in the original form with a unique ID of some sort - use $_SERVER['UNIQUE_ID'] if it's available on your system, but mktime() will do if it's not. If you log this ID somewhere when you originally process the form, you can check any submitted data against your log to see if it's already been processed. HTH Jon From kris at midtempo.net Mon Nov 3 04:42:25 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:42:25 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [php] preg_replace text links? In-Reply-To: <3FA64387.4020805@contactjuggling.org> References: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031103103230.00a94cb8@mail.btinternet.com> >>what i'm trying to do is scan user submitted text (parsed through >>htmlspecialchars) pick out any links and link 'em up. > >$a=preg_replace("/(http:\/\/|www|[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.|[a-zA-Z0-9\.-]+@)(([a-zA-Z >0-9-][a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9-\.\/\_\?\%\#\&\=\;\~\!\(\)]+)/","href=\"http://\\1\\2\">\\1\\2",$a); > >that extracts most links and creates HTML links. this is great, unless they include "http://" in their text (which then results in: unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['var_name']); > > looks promising, but when i refresh the page, the vars are still there, > Still dont know how to prevent people to refresh the page and thus > executing the same php-code with the same vars twice. > :-( Jan, The problem you are facing is client side not server, the clients browsers are the ones who are remembering the post or get data. When you hit refresh in your browser it sends the last request it did again. So if your request was post: http://your.sever/page.php?user=fred and you add fred to your user list then unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['user']); the server has deleted the user value but not the client, if you refresh the client it will send post: http://your.sever/page.php?user=fred again. You have two choices: 1. Validate the data before it is entered into the data source to check for duplicates, not bad practice anyway! 2. Force the browsers behaviour (this is the solution I sent to you before) by sending headers back to the browser that the page content has changed and that it should load a "new" location. This approach is limited by your page flow, to explain further if you are doing something like this: form-page.php > form-process.php then you will not be able to control the clients retaining the post data. To be successful you need to write one page that handles the form and data, see the sudo code below. one-page.php if(no post data exists){show form} if(post data exists){ add to data source unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['user']); header("Status: 205 Reset Content"); //reload the page without the form data header("Location: one-page.php"); } Now if the client hits refresh the browser will send the last request it had, the one we told it to request by using header("Location: one-page.php"); that would be get: http://your.sever/one-page.php . Well, I hope that is clearer than mud for you... Simon From dunstan at 1976design.com Mon Nov 3 05:19:03 2003 From: dunstan at 1976design.com (Dunstan Orchard) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:19:03 +0000 Subject: [thelist] Re: [php] preg_replace text links? In-Reply-To: <200311031047.hA3AlGM12012@ns.graphitedesign.net> References: <200311031047.hA3AlGM12012@ns.graphitedesign.net> Message-ID: <20031103111903.M5313@1976design.com> Hi Kris, I use this code that Kelly gave to me: function url_to_link($string) { // link URLs $string = eregi_replace("(([[:alnum:]]+://)|www\.)([^[:space:]]*)([[:alnum:]#?/&=])", "\\1\\3\\4", $string); // fix lazy URLs $string = eregi_replace("href=\"www","href=\"http://www", $string); // link mailtos $string = eregi_replace("(([a-z0-9_]|\\-|\\.)+@([^[:space:]]*)([[:alnum:]-]))", "\\1", $string); // truncates long urls that can cause display problems $string = preg_replace("/>(([[:alnum:]]+:\/\/)|www\.)([^[:space:]]{30,40})([^[:space:]]*)([^[:space:]]{10,20})([[:alnum:]#?\/&=])\\1\\3...\\5\\6<", $string); $string = stripslashes($string); return $string; } I then altered it a bit so that I can print the person's name and link that to the url they submitted (for my blog): function url_to_link_poster($string, $name) { // link URLs $string = eregi_replace("(([[:alnum:]]+://)|www\.)([^[:space:]]*)([[:alnum:]#?/&=])", "$name", $string); // fix lazy URLs $string = eregi_replace("href=\"www","href=\"http://www", $string); $string = stripslashes($string); return $string; } It's worked out perfectly for me for a while now. HTH - Dunstan --------------------------- Dorset, England http://www.1976design.com/ http://www.1976design.com/blog/ From hershelr at netvision.net.il Mon Nov 3 05:37:54 2003 From: hershelr at netvision.net.il (Hershel Robinson) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 06:37:54 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <001401c3a1fe$ec723a60$0300000a@hershel2000> > ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > From: John Corry > > > > Accessibility is not an issue in the long term... [...] > ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > accessibility should *always* be an issue, especially with > something that > can so easily be done in a more accessible fashion. i'll > agree that there > are times when budget, expediency, etc. that accessibility > gets a lower > priority than usual, but i don't see how that's the case here. Just to play devil's advocate, what about a case where one is developing for an intranet or other NON-cross-browser site where all the users are already required to have JS enabled to use the site. In such a situation, why not use a link to submit the form if the link looks better on the page? In particular, if the client likes a link and not a button, why not? Again, I am speaking in a case where JS and browser-choice are NOT left up to the visitors. Hershel From kverens at contactjuggling.org Mon Nov 3 07:58:43 2003 From: kverens at contactjuggling.org (Kae Verens) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:58:43 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [php] preg_replace text links? In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20031103103230.00a94cb8@mail.btinternet.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> <4.2.0.58.20031103103230.00a94cb8@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <3FA65F13.3040405@contactjuggling.org> kris burford wrote: >> >> $a=preg_replace("/(http:\/\/|www|[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.|[a-zA-Z0-9\.-]+@)(([a-zA-Z >> 0-9-][a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9-\.\/\_\?\%\#\&\=\;\~\!\(\)]+)/","> href=\"http://\\1\\2\">\\1\\2",$a); >> >> that extracts most links and creates HTML links. > > > this is great, unless they include "http://" in their text (which then > results in: To: Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [thelist] deleting php vars > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jan guichelaar [artmiks]" > > unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['var_name']); > > > > looks promising, but when i refresh the page, the vars are still there, > > Still dont know how to prevent people to refresh the page and thus > > executing the same php-code with the same vars twice. > > :-( > Jan, > > The problem you are facing is client side not server, the clients browsers > are the ones who are remembering the post or get data. When you hit refresh > in your browser it sends the last request it did again. So if your request > was post: http://your.sever/page.php?user=fred and you add fred to your user > list then unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['user']); the server has deleted the user > value but not the client, if you refresh the client it will send post: > http://your.sever/page.php?user=fred again. > > You have two choices: > > 1. Validate the data before it is entered into the data source to check for > duplicates, not bad practice anyway! > > 2. Force the browsers behaviour (this is the solution I sent to you before) > by sending headers back to the browser that the page content has changed and > that it should load a "new" location. This approach is limited by your page > flow, to explain further if you are doing something like this: > > form-page.php > form-process.php > > then you will not be able to control the clients retaining the post data. To > be successful you need to write one page that handles the form and data, see > the sudo code below. > > one-page.php > if(no post data exists){show form} > if(post data exists){ > add to data source > unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['user']); > header("Status: 205 Reset Content"); > //reload the page without the form data > header("Location: one-page.php"); > } > > Now if the client hits refresh the browser will send the last request it > had, the one we told it to request by using header("Location: > one-page.php"); that would be get: http://your.sever/one-page.php . > > Well, I hope that is clearer than mud for you... > > Simon > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > From stevejenkins444 at hotmail.com Mon Nov 3 07:03:26 2003 From: stevejenkins444 at hotmail.com (Steve Jenkins) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:03:26 -0000 Subject: [thelist] Tomcat versus Apache _and_ Tomcat Message-ID: Hi Anyone know why one should deploy a live production server with Apache and Tomcat as opposed to with just Tomcat? Any guidance would be most welcome. Cheers Steve. From psm2713 at hotmail.com Mon Nov 3 07:41:50 2003 From: psm2713 at hotmail.com (Ken Moore) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 06:41:50 -0700 Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice Message-ID: Hi all, I need some advice marketing advice. I have developed some website-based services for insurance agents. The agents that have the services think that they are great and that they will very much help the bottom line. The problem is that I cannot sell foot warmers to Eskimos. I need someone to do the marketing. There is a very great income potential for the right company or person. Where do I go to look for someone or some company that can do that? You can answer either on or off of the list at psm2713 at hotmail.com TIA, Ken _________________________________________________________________ Enjoy MSN 8 patented spam control and more with MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service. Try it FREE for one month! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup From dan at danromanchik.com Mon Nov 3 09:13:41 2003 From: dan at danromanchik.com (Dan Romanchik) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:13:41 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice References: Message-ID: <004601c3a21d$11384ec0$6401a8c0@D9J77B01> Finding salespeople is hard. I've tried find someone to do some selling for me as well, with little success. I've posted to mailing lists, advertised on a local jobs board, and tried spreading the word through my "network." I got a few nibbles, but no one bit. The problem is the level of risk involved. What you have to do is sell (there's that four-letter word again) someone that the potential you are offering is worth the risk they'll have to take. Like I say, I haven't been able to do that yet, but you may have something that has more potential than what I was trying to sell. Let us know how it goes... Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Romanchik - Web Developer dan at danromanchik.com, 734-930-6564 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Moore" To: Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:41 AM Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice > Hi all, > > I need some advice marketing advice. I have developed some website-based > services for insurance agents. The agents that have the services think that > they are great and that they will very much help the bottom line. > > The problem is that I cannot sell foot warmers to Eskimos. I need someone to > do the marketing. There is a very great income potential for the right > company or person. > > Where do I go to look for someone or some company that can do that? > > You can answer either on or off of the list at psm2713 at hotmail.com > > TIA, > > Ken > > _________________________________________________________________ > Enjoy MSN 8 patented spam control and more with MSN 8 Dial-up Internet > Service. Try it FREE for one month! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > From Tab.Alleman at MetroGuide.com Mon Nov 3 09:50:44 2003 From: Tab.Alleman at MetroGuide.com (Tab Alleman) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:50:44 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Native website authentication - IIS 5 Message-ID: Wow, thanks Ken..guess I don't need a tutorial after all. Ken Schaefer wrote: (everything I needed to know) From headlemur at lemurzone.com Mon Nov 3 10:02:31 2003 From: headlemur at lemurzone.com (the head lemur) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:02:31 -0700 Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice References: <004601c3a21d$11384ec0$6401a8c0@D9J77B01> Message-ID: <001b01c3a223$e58ec540$0200a8c0@ph.cox.net> > > The problem is that I cannot sell foot warmers to Eskimos. Congratulations! There are very few designers who have any sort of sales experience, or want to develop it. :) In order of preference: Find your local agent association,(there is one, ya may just have to dig it out) and give a demo. Some of the folks who call on agents are representitives of Bodyshops, glass companies, Boardup services, remodelers, rental car agencies, flood and water damage repair specialists, and anybody who does work for insurance companies post claim. The tough part is finding a sales representitive who understands the web, your product and can use computers. #1 sales tip sell the office manager. she is the only person in the organization who Knows where everything is. she is the person most likely to end up using your service. the head lemur News: http://www.lemurzone.com/news/ Interviews: http://www.lemurzone.com/pixelview/ blog: http://theheadlemur.typepad.com/ Community: http://www.evolt.org From jeff at jeffhowden.com Mon Nov 3 10:24:23 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:24:23 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <001401c3a1fe$ec723a60$0300000a@hershel2000> Message-ID: hershel, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: Hershel Robinson > > > accessibility should *always* be an issue, especially > > with something that can so easily be done in a more > > accessible fashion. i'll agree that there are times > > when budget, expediency, etc. that accessibility gets > > a lower priority than usual, but i don't see how > > that's the case here. > > Just to play devil's advocate, what about a case where > one is developing for an intranet or other > NON-cross-browser site where all the users are already > required to have JS enabled to use the site. In such a > situation, why not use a link to submit the form if the > link looks better on the page? In particular, if the > client likes a link and not a button, why not? > > Again, I am speaking in a case where JS and > browser-choice are NOT left up to the visitors. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< there are lots of reasons. 1) some browsers break forms that don't have an actual submit button meaning you can't use the enter key to submit the form. some claim this as a good thing, but it's not. it's a disruption of expected behavior for those users accustomed to it. 2) look all around you at data collection forms. in practically all the cases a button is used to submit the data, not a link. using a link is a departure from normal ui conventions and will be nothing but a confusion for your users. 3) can you really mandate that non-sighted users use ie as well? or, are you going to have to succumb to their need to use a screenreader (which may or may not be based on the ie web browser control)? 4) what do you do if the company gets a wild hair up their bum and changes their browser standard internally? don't get me wrong, the work i do requires win/ie6 to use the administrative tools. we do this because this combination covers about 98% of our existing clients. it greatly reduces development time so the client gets more for their money. it also means we can reuse alot of stuff written for other projects that's already been tested, saving the client even *more* money. if they want us to support a different browser or os, the rate for administrative tools goes up *tremendously*. my point in saying that accessibility should always be a concern is that you never know when a wrench is going to get thrown into the works. better to consider those things ahead of time. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From mail at kentrygiel.com Mon Nov 3 10:26:56 2003 From: mail at kentrygiel.com (kent) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:26:56 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen Message-ID: <20031103162656.2922.qmail@smtp1.wedohosting.com> Hopefully I'm not repeating a thread here but surprisingly I couldn't find anything comprehensive about this issue: Languages. A client wants to serve up both an English and French version of a website. We do not want to default to English with the thinking that this might "offend" our French audience, for lack of a better word. So we have two options: 1. A splash page with language choice/selection. 2. Utilize a script to detect the default langauge set on the user's browser. So, I am wondering how effective it is to rely on detection of the language setting of the user's browser. I have noticed that none of the big websites (IBM nor al.) give me a French page when I change the language option in my browser. Does anyone know why this language detection is not utilized more often? As for a splash page, I tend to dislike adding this extra step for entering a site. But in order to deal with this language issue, is this the recommended course of action? I need the site to be search engine- friendly, which is another reason why I want to avoid a splash page. If anyone would reply to directly to me, I can post a summary. Thanks, Kent From marcan at home.se Mon Nov 3 10:35:54 2003 From: marcan at home.se (Marcus Andersson) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:35:54 +0100 Subject: [thelist] png in IE Message-ID: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> Hi I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. The icons have transparent backgrounds that works nicely in Mozilla/Photoshop. When I use them in IE I get this ugly grey background instead of the transparent one. Should I do anything special to make it work or should I consider to convert the icons to gif? /Marcus From hershelr at netvision.net.il Mon Nov 3 10:43:42 2003 From: hershelr at netvision.net.il (Hershel Robinson) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:43:42 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice In-Reply-To: <001b01c3a223$e58ec540$0200a8c0@ph.cox.net> Message-ID: <006b01c3a229$a4adac70$0300000a@hershel2000> I have no advice about marketing, sorry. Interestingly enough, however, I have a little story to share. I registered a domain name a few days ago and put up on the site an "Under Construction..." page. Today, someone just called me on the phone and asked me what are my plans for that site. I said I was uncertain and he proceeded to tell me that he's from a web design and development company... I told him I don't need a web designer and that was that. Now that's what I call direct marketing! Getting lost or confused with your DIVs and SPANs and whatnot on a CSS layout page? Try putting in different color 1 pixel solid borders to various DIVs and SPANs and that can clarify what's happening. Hershel From roselli at earthlink.net Mon Nov 3 10:52:58 2003 From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:52:58 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <001401c3a1fe$ec723a60$0300000a@hershel2000> References: Message-ID: > From: Hershel Robinson > > Just to play devil's advocate, what about a case where one is > developing for an intranet or other NON-cross-browser site where all > the users are already required to have JS enabled to use the site. In > such a situation, why not use a link to submit the form if the link > looks better on the page? In particular, if the client likes a link > and not a button, why not? if your sole concern is the look of the button, why use JS to tackle it when it could be done more quickly and with less hassle (and code) with CSS? your scenario presents a specific browser/platform combo, so this could easily satisfy it if that combo is CSS-friendly... i have done this in the past -- styled a button to look like a hyperlink -- at the client's request in a closed intranet... i found it was faster, easier, and offered more flexibility to use CSS... -- my latest book project: Web Graphics for Non-Designers http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591712/evoltorg02-20 ISBN: 1590591712 From roselli at earthlink.net Mon Nov 3 10:56:23 2003 From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:56:23 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Page Size In-Reply-To: <20031102212440.GA6830%david@dorward.me.uk> References: <2bc62c2c0f09.2c0f092bc62c@optonline.net> Message-ID: > From: David Dorward > > > I am curious as to the general consensus on designing sites for > > 1024x768 resolution monitors. Is this a good practice or should I > > avoid designing a site for monitor sizes larger than 800x600. > > http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?AnySizeDesign this is giving me an error, so how about an article at evolt.org: http://evolt.org/liquid_design -- my latest book project: Web Graphics for Non-Designers http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591712/evoltorg02-20 ISBN: 1590591712 From roselli at earthlink.net Mon Nov 3 11:01:41 2003 From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:01:41 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Page Size; Fixed Layout In-Reply-To: <20031102220634.GA7192%david@dorward.me.uk> References: <2c19c82bed17.2bed172c19c8@optonline.net> Message-ID: > From: David Dorward [...] > > Given this piece of valuable information, is it a good idea to > > design pages at 1024? > > No. A significant proportion of users still use 800x600, and even > those on higher don't always run their browser windows fullscreen. and there's something to be said for actually finding out what your audience uses: http://evolt.org/Screen_Stats_1 part two of that article, while 3+ years old, also talks about findings from the code in part 1... and i second the notion that targetting 1024 as your baseline is probably a bad idea... especially given the full-screen concept... -- my latest book project: Web Graphics for Non-Designers http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591712/evoltorg02-20 ISBN: 1590591712 From developer at lazor.net Mon Nov 3 11:07:39 2003 From: developer at lazor.net (developer at lazor.net) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:07:39 -0500 Subject: [thelist] mshtml, absolute and relative links Message-ID: <200311031207390548.04E82917@mail.lazor.net> I've been working on a cross-browser (ie/mozilla) web based wysiwyg for a little while now and have also reviewed at least 10 other ones that are out there. My problem is that I need it to use relative links (/mysite/subdir/somepage.html) instead of the absolute links it generates because we use multiple servers in our environment and want the code it generates to be portable. It seems like it's internal to IE because even if I pass a relative URL for an image or a link, it converts it to an absolute one. I've done quite a bit of googling on this and see mentions of people accomplishing this but can find no references as to how. Has anyone here been able to do this? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks. Mike From norman.bunn at craftedsolutions.com Mon Nov 3 11:11:08 2003 From: norman.bunn at craftedsolutions.com (Norman Bunn) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:11:08 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen References: <20031103162656.2922.qmail@smtp1.wedohosting.com> Message-ID: <04e901c3a22d$79234b10$ef49fea9@DELL4500> First I recommend that you use a cookie to hold a person's language preference and use that to drive which presentation they receive. Second, I think you should have a link on each page that allows the user to change preferences as he/she desires, resetting the cookie as needed. Third, if you use the language detect option, I would use that as a backup to the cookie (cookie has priority) and I would use it to prompt a user in that language and English that an alternate language is available. Finally, I would avoid the splash page altogether. Since most web sites are in English, it should not offend someone if it starts that way, and if it starts in French, I would not be offended either; I'd just look for the "English" option button. Norman Bunn www.CraftedSolutions.com 803-405-1008 ----- Original Message ----- From: "kent" To: Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: [thelist] Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen > Hopefully I'm not repeating a thread here but surprisingly I couldn't find > anything comprehensive about this issue: Languages. > > A client wants to serve up both an English and French version of a website. > We do not want to default to English with the thinking that this might > "offend" our French audience, for lack of a better word. So we have two > options: > > 1. A splash page with language choice/selection. > 2. Utilize a script to detect the default langauge set on the user's > browser. > > So, I am wondering how effective it is to rely on detection of the language > setting of the user's browser. I have noticed that none of the big websites > (IBM nor al.) give me a French page when I change the language option in my > browser. Does anyone know why this language detection is not utilized more > often? > > As for a splash page, I tend to dislike adding this extra step for entering > a site. But in order to deal with this language issue, is this the > recommended course of action? I need the site to be search engine- friendly, > which is another reason why I want to avoid a splash page. > > If anyone would reply to directly to me, I can post a summary. > > Thanks, > > Kent > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > From kris at midtempo.net Mon Nov 3 11:11:15 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:11:15 +0000 Subject: [thelist] png in IE In-Reply-To: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031103170824.00a99d88@mail.btinternet.com> >I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. hi marcus, alistapart has some stuff to say about this: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/pngopacity/ hth kris From simon.perry at si-designs.co.uk Mon Nov 3 11:14:57 2003 From: simon.perry at si-designs.co.uk (Simon Perry) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:14:57 -0000 Subject: [thelist] png in IE References: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> Message-ID: <002f01c3a22e$019149c0$3100a8c0@xppro> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Andersson" > Hi > > I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. The > icons have transparent backgrounds that works nicely in > Mozilla/Photoshop. When I use them in IE I get this ugly grey background > instead of the transparent one. > > Should I do anything special to make it work or should I consider to > convert the icons to gif? IE does not properly support png files, if you want transparency then you will have to use gifs. Simon From liorean at f2o.org Mon Nov 3 11:15:57 2003 From: liorean at f2o.org (liorean) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 18:15:57 +0100 Subject: [thelist] png in IE In-Reply-To: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> References: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> Message-ID: <3FA68D4D.8000508@f2o.org> Marcus Andersson wrote: > I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. The > icons have transparent backgrounds that works nicely in > Mozilla/Photoshop. When I use them in IE I get this ugly grey background > instead of the transparent one. > > Should I do anything special to make it work or should I consider to > convert the icons to gif? There's a number of things you could do. First of all, do you use alpha channels or pure on/off transparency? IE handles 8bit PNGs as were they gifs, in other words if you make your PNGs 8bit, you will get full transparency for all alpha channels, but a smaller size than the equivalent gif. As for getting alpha channels to work, you can do that to. Have a look at for making high-color 16-48bit to work. It requires both stylesheets and Javascript to work. (You can combine it with a conditional comments for a valid way of doing it.) -- liorean ViewStyles, ViewScripts, ToggleStyles and GraphicsInfo bookmarklets and Theme Switcher, Cookies Handler scripts: From contact at stewartandcompany.net Mon Nov 3 11:18:02 2003 From: contact at stewartandcompany.net (Stewart & Company) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:18:02 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Page Size In-Reply-To: <1E3D18AA-0D79-11D8-AB67-003065A5B276@brightstorm.co.uk> Message-ID: <000001c3a22e$714e7b70$2fa5aec7@Will> If you have to design the website at a fixed width, stay well under 800 px. I usually do 740 px max. Here are some links to help: http://www.evolt.org/article/ds/17/2295/ http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/99/41/index3a.html HTH, Will On 2 Nov 2003, at 20:49, live4bacon at optonline.net wrote: > I am curious as to the general consensus on designing sites for > 1024x768 resolution monitors. Is this a good practice or should I > avoid designing a site for monitor sizes larger than 800x600. From hershelr at netvision.net.il Mon Nov 3 11:26:53 2003 From: hershelr at netvision.net.il (Hershel Robinson) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:26:53 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <0HNS00FWUDE1DN@mxin3.netvision.net.il> Message-ID: <006f01c3a22f$ad173dd0$0300000a@hershel2000> > if your sole concern is the look of the button, why use JS to tackle > it when it could be done more quickly and with less hassle (and > code) with CSS? your scenario presents a specific > browser/platform combo, so this could easily satisfy it if that > combo is CSS-friendly... > > i have done this in the past -- styled a button to look like a > hyperlink -- at the client's request in a closed intranet... > i found it > was faster, easier, and offered more flexibility to use CSS... Faster and easier? But then I would have to write JS to create a rollover effect. :) >From .jeff: > 1) some browsers break forms that don't have an actual > submit button meaning you can't use the enter key to > submit the form. some claim this as a good thing, > but it's not. it's a disruption of expected > behavior for those users accustomed to it. But I wrote about a NON-cross browser site, so this is not a problem if the ONE browser allows the button. (furthermore you could also write JS to handle this) > 2) look all around you at data collection forms. in > practically all the cases a button is used to submit > the data, not a link. using a link is a departure > from normal ui conventions and will be nothing but > a confusion for your users. I disagree. Many sites use an image as a submit 'button' (especially for searches) and for the casual user, that looks more like a link than a button. > 3) can you really mandate that non-sighted users use > ie as well? or, are you going to have to succumb to > their need to use a screenreader (which may or may > not be based on the ie web browser control)? Again, I'm talking about a NON-cross browser site. If the site only supports one browser, then YES all users would have to use THAT browser. :) > 4) what do you do if the company gets a wild hair up > their bum and changes their browser standard > internally? Now you have come to your singular interesting point. If that were to happen, then I would just explain to them (as they already know) that it will take me X days to deal with converting their site to a new browser. :) Hershel From Tab.Alleman at MetroGuide.com Mon Nov 3 11:31:30 2003 From: Tab.Alleman at MetroGuide.com (Tab Alleman) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:31:30 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript Message-ID: Sometimes you have to use a link because you need to dynamically generate it. aardvark wrote: >> From: Hershel Robinson >> >> Just to play devil's advocate, what about a case where one is >> developing for an intranet or other NON-cross-browser site where all >> the users are already required to have JS enabled to use the site. In >> such a situation, why not use a link to submit the form if the link >> looks better on the page? In particular, if the client likes a link >> and not a button, why not? > > if your sole concern is the look of the button, why use JS to tackle > it when it could be done more quickly and with less hassle (and > code) with CSS? your scenario presents a specific > browser/platform combo, so this could easily satisfy it if that > combo is CSS-friendly... > > i have done this in the past -- styled a button to look like a > hyperlink -- at the client's request in a closed intranet... i found > it was faster, easier, and offered more flexibility to use CSS... > > > -- > my latest book project: > Web Graphics for Non-Designers > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591712/evoltorg02-20 > ISBN: 1590591712 From paul at teltest.com Mon Nov 3 11:41:20 2003 From: paul at teltest.com (Paul Bennett) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 06:41:20 +1300 Subject: [thelist] deleting php vars In-Reply-To: <01c301c3a1f0$5d596af0$1001a8c0@janpc> References: <002501c39ef2$d6285eb0$1001a8c0@janpc> <3FA17B23.5000100@teltest.com> <01c301c3a1f0$5d596af0$1001a8c0@janpc> Message-ID: <3FA69340.5080905@teltest.com> jan guichelaar [artmiks] wrote: >unset ( $HTTP_POST_VARS['var_name']); > >looks promising, but when i refresh the page, the vars are still there, >Still dont know how to prevent people to refresh the page and thus >executing the same php-code with the same vars twice. >:-( > > oh, *that* is what you are trying to do. You could try setting a cookie when the page runs - something like 'run'=1, then if they refresh you can check for the cookie at the beginning of your script and if it exists, don't run the code. This of course will only work with JS enabled. Other than that you could enter the users session id (you can append these to the url if you want to get all the non-js browsers) in a db table when the code is run and then at the beginning of your script check if the id already has an entry in the table. If it does you now not to run the code. Ah, the joys of building applications for a stateless protocol..... :) -- ------------------------------ Paul Bennett Internet Developer Teltest Electronic Design ------------------------------ Email: paul at teltest.com Phone: 64 4 237 4557 Web: http://www.teltest.com Wap: http://wap.teltest.com From cs1spw at bath.ac.uk Mon Nov 3 11:53:47 2003 From: cs1spw at bath.ac.uk (Simon Willison) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:53:47 -0600 Subject: [thelist] [php] preg_replace text links? In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <3FA6962B.30507@bath.ac.uk> kris burford wrote: > i'm trying to get my head around some regex in php which i've lifted > (with only minor understanding) from "mastering regex expressions". > > what i'm trying to do is scan user submitted text (parsed through > htmlspecialchars) pick out any links and link 'em up. One solution is simply to not use regular expressions to solve this particular problem. I wrote up a blog entry on this technique (with sample code) a while ago: http://simon.incutio.com/archive/2003/10/19/convertingLinks Regular expressions are awesomely powerful, but that power often comes at the expense of readability and sometimes even being able to understand fully what your code is really doing. -- Simon Willison Web development weblog: http://simon.incutio.com/ From cs1spw at bath.ac.uk Mon Nov 3 11:56:43 2003 From: cs1spw at bath.ac.uk (Simon Willison) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:56:43 -0600 Subject: [thelist] png in IE In-Reply-To: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> References: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> Message-ID: <3FA696DB.8080302@bath.ac.uk> Marcus Andersson wrote: > I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. The > icons have transparent backgrounds that works nicely in > Mozilla/Photoshop. When I use them in IE I get this ugly grey background > instead of the transparent one. > > Should I do anything special to make it work or should I consider to > convert the icons to gif? IE for Windows doesn't support alpha-transparent PNGs, despite the standard having been finalised over 5 years ago. There is a workaround but it's weird voodoo magic - still, it might be just what you're after: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/bobosola/ If that isn't suitable you'll have to switch back to transparent gifs. -- Simon Willison Web development weblog: http://simon.incutio.com/ From gassinaumasis at hotmail.com Mon Nov 3 12:00:14 2003 From: gassinaumasis at hotmail.com (Peter-Paul Koch) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 18:00:14 +0000 Subject: [thelist] Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen Message-ID: >Hopefully I'm not repeating a thread here but surprisingly I couldn't find >anything comprehensive about this issue: Languages. > >A client wants to serve up both an English and French version of a website. >We do not want to default to English with the thinking that this might >"offend" our French audience, for lack of a better word. So we have two >options: > >1. A splash page with language choice/selection. >2. Utilize a script to detect the default langauge set on the user's >browser. 3. Use my new Bilingual Pages script. http://www.quirksmode.org/js/bilingual.html On the opening page, show a small text in both languages, followed by 'Read more' or 'Lisez plus' (I assume). The user will click on the link in the language of his choice. My script captures this click and sets a cookie that remembers the language. If you include the script on all pages in the site, the user will see the language of his choice, while the other one is greyed out and very small. This script is still in experimental stage, usability-wise. Technically it works. I would welcome comments on its (lack of) usability. ------------------------------------------------------------------- ppk, freelance web developer Interaction, copywriting, JavaScript, integration http://www.quirksmode.org/ Column "Keep it Simple": http://www.digital-web.com/columns/keepitsimple/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus From hassan at webtuitive.com Mon Nov 3 12:01:42 2003 From: hassan at webtuitive.com (Hassan Schroeder) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:01:42 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Tomcat versus Apache _and_ Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FA69806.9060909@webtuitive.com> Steve Jenkins wrote: > Anyone know why one should deploy a live production server with > Apache and Tomcat as opposed to with just Tomcat? 1) you need a capability provided by an Apache module and don't want to re-create that wheel in Java 2) familiarity with Apache configuration (SSL, authentication, etc.) 3) performance of non-servlet/jsp assets, like images This latter sounds like "conventional wisdom" that may or may not be true. If you look at org.apache.catalina.servlets.DefaultServlet, it *is* kind of a kitchen-sink handler, but in casual testing I didn't see much difference between Apache-served and Tomcat-served images. If your testing showed otherwise, it wouldn't be hard to add your own optimized image-handling servlet, though. Actually, google, or ask on the Tomcat list; someone may have already done it :-) HTH! -- Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- hassan at webtuitive.com Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. From marcan at home.se Mon Nov 3 12:06:58 2003 From: marcan at home.se (Marcus Andersson) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:06:58 +0100 Subject: SV: [thelist] png in IE In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20031103170824.00a99d88@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <001501c3a235$4631efb0$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> Thanks for the link. The article proposes a filter :( . I found it myself a couple of minutes ago and I don't really like it since I have some bad performance experience regarding filters in IE. But, if it's the only way I guess I just have to like it /Marcus -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] F?r kris burford Skickat: den 3 november 2003 18:11 Till: thelist at lists.evolt.org ?mne: Re: [thelist] png in IE >I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. hi marcus, alistapart has some stuff to say about this: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/pngopacity/ hth kris -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From pixelmech at yahoo.com Mon Nov 3 09:41:14 2003 From: pixelmech at yahoo.com (Tom Dell'Aringa) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:41:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: [thelist] using character entities Message-ID: <20031103154114.46478.qmail@web12605.mail.yahoo.com> Hello, Just working on my HTML guidelines doc again for my department. I'm on HTML character entities, and I'm trying to explain the reason why you should use them (we are generally using XHTML transitional) in our pages. I've been using them long enough, but for some reason I cannot come up with the reason why. Sure, pages won't validate is a partial reason, but not really a good one and not one that will be accepted here. I feel as though I am missing the obvious but can't think of it... Tom ===== http://www.pixelmech.com/ :: Web Development Services http://www.DMXzone.com/ :: JavaScript Author / Every Friday! http://www.thywordistruth.net/ :: Eternal Life "I'll ho ho and ha ha you!" (Daffy Duck) From rob.smith at THERMON.com Mon Nov 3 12:33:01 2003 From: rob.smith at THERMON.com (Rob Smith) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:33:01 -0600 Subject: [thelist] png in IE Message-ID: <0CEC8258A6E4D611BE5400306E1CC9271E5160@smtmb.tmc.local> First of all, don't use .png's. They don't render in some browsers as well as the Asian browsers, at last check. Use what you know works (i.e. gif / jpg). Rob -----Original Message----- From: Marcus Andersson [mailto:marcan at home.se] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:36 AM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: [thelist] png in IE Hi I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. The icons have transparent backgrounds that works nicely in Mozilla/Photoshop. When I use them in IE I get this ugly grey background instead of the transparent one. Should I do anything special to make it work or should I consider to convert the icons to gif? /Marcus -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From hershelr at netvision.net.il Mon Nov 3 12:38:53 2003 From: hershelr at netvision.net.il (Hershel Robinson) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:38:53 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <007301c3a239$bbe8af10$0300000a@hershel2000> > Sometimes you have to use a link because you need to dynamically > generate it. Ummm, you can also generate a button via the DOM. :) You could generate the entire form via JS actually. Hershel From hassan at webtuitive.com Mon Nov 3 12:56:20 2003 From: hassan at webtuitive.com (Hassan Schroeder) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:56:20 -0800 Subject: [thelist] deleting php vars In-Reply-To: <3FA69340.5080905@teltest.com> References: <002501c39ef2$d6285eb0$1001a8c0@janpc> <3FA17B23.5000100@teltest.com> <01c301c3a1f0$5d596af0$1001a8c0@janpc> <3FA69340.5080905@teltest.com> Message-ID: <3FA6A4D4.1090204@webtuitive.com> Paul Bennett wrote: > Other than that you could enter the users session id (you can append > these to the url if you want to get all the non-js browsers) in a db > table when the code is run and then at the beginning of your script > check if the id already has an entry in the table. If it does you now > not to run the code. Just make the sessionId field in the database UNIQUE. An attempt to insert it again will fail; catch that exception and return an appropriate response. -- Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- hassan at webtuitive.com Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. From Tim.Kuhn at gettyimages.com Mon Nov 3 13:12:46 2003 From: Tim.Kuhn at gettyimages.com (Tim Kuhn (temp)) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:12:46 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Re: Page Size; Fixed Layout Message-ID: <05B9FC51BB35C247859214C18073CCB90649EF@seafrexchrestor.sea.amer.gettywan.com> -----Original Message----- From: thelist-request at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-request at lists.evolt.org] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:03 AM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: thelist Digest, Vol 9, Issue 5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Page Size; Fixed Layout >No. A significant proportion of users still use 800x600, and even >those on higher don't always run their browser windows fullscreen. You also cannot forget your users on laptops. 800x600 is a better goal with them in mind. -- ======================================================= This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. ======================================================= From kris at midtempo.net Mon Nov 3 13:14:20 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:14:20 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [php] preg_replace text links? In-Reply-To: <3FA6962B.30507@bath.ac.uk> References: <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> <4.2.0.58.20031103091915.00a5a098@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031103190038.00a87c18@mail.btinternet.com> >One solution is simply to not use regular expressions to solve this >particular problem. I wrote up a blog entry on this technique (with sample >code) a while ago: > >http://simon.incutio.com/archive/2003/10/19/convertingLinks hi simon, that's a really nice explanation. thanks. kris make sure if you're serializing arrays for posting via a form that you base64_encode/decode them. The serialized string otherwise contains quotations that will mess up your form and add/stripslashes doesn't work. be careful when using array_unique as it *does not* sort out the key increment. so if you subsequently use the array in a for loop referenced by indices, you'll experience weird results! instead use: (from user submitted comment on php.net) function my_array_unique($array){ $tmparr = array_unique($array); $i=0; foreach ($tmparr as $v) { $newarr[$i] = $v; $i++; } return $newarr; } From jeff at jeffhowden.com Mon Nov 3 13:26:50 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:26:50 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <006f01c3a22f$ad173dd0$0300000a@hershel2000> Message-ID: hershel, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: Hershel Robinson > > > i have done this in the past -- styled a button to > > look like a hyperlink -- at the client's request in > > a closed intranet... i found it was faster, easier, > > and offered more flexibility to use CSS... > > Faster and easier? But then I would have to write JS to > create a rollover effect. :) ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< surely the "cost" of writing a simple color swapping mouseover script is far less. what's more, if the browser you have to support is mozilla, it supports the :hover pseudo-protocol making scripting pointless. on the other hand, if it's ie/win you have to support, then just use a behavior attached to the class you use for your submit buttons. that behavior can be built to mimic the :hover pseudo-protocol very nicely. now the forms aren't potentially broken and they're usable by users without javascript, even if the intranet *mandates* it (now). ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > 1) some browsers break forms that don't have an actual > > submit button meaning you can't use the enter key > > to submit the form. some claim this as a good > > thing, but it's not. it's a disruption of > > expected behavior for those users accustomed to it. > > But I wrote about a NON-cross browser site, so this is > not a problem if the ONE browser allows the button. > (furthermore you could also write JS to handle this) ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< great, throw more scripting at a problem that wouldn't exist if you didn't insist in mangling the ui with javascript to begin with. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > 2) look all around you at data collection forms. in > > practically all the cases a button is used to > > submit the data, not a link. using a link is a > > departure from normal ui conventions and will be > > nothing but a confusion for your users. > > I disagree. Many sites use an image as a submit 'button' > (especially for searches) and for the casual user, that > looks more like a link than a button. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< did i say site? no, i was far more general than that. i said "data collection forms". these could just as easily be preferences/options/input dialogs. i suspect that many users interact with these sorts of dialogs far more than they do with data collection forms on websites. the fact that people use graphical submit buttons simply muddies the usability in general, but doesn't support your claim. furthermore, *very* few will actually make the image look like a text link. most sites that use a graphical submit button still use an image that resembles a button. so, in the users mind, they consider it a button because of the form field it sits next to, rather than a link. [aside: many of the people who use graphical submit buttons are doing so in a manner that goes against the original intent of the graphical submit button. it's not meant to be used to "prettify" a form, but to give the user a mechanism to send mouse-click coordinates to the server for one purpose or another (most useful with mapping).] ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > 3) can you really mandate that non-sighted users use > > ie as well? or, are you going to have to succumb > > to their need to use a screenreader (which may or > > may not be based on the ie web browser control)? > > Again, I'm talking about a NON-cross browser site. If > the site only supports one browser, then YES all users > would have to use THAT browser. :) ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< then what is the visually impaired user supposed to do? and suppose they do find a way to use the intranet using the mandated browser along with a screenreader. which makes more sense (read them aloud)? -Data Entry Form - - text - -List Box- -Link: Submit -End of Data Entry Form - or -Data Entry Form - - text - -List Box- - submit - -End of Data Entry Form - which one is more apparent how to submit the form? now, i gave your example a slight improvement by using text in the link, but the fact that it's a link makes it really confusing. sure, with time the user can get past the fact that it says "Link: ". however, forms *should* be slightly more intuitive than that. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > 4) what do you do if the company gets a wild hair up > > their bum and changes their browser standard > > internally? > > Now you have come to your singular interesting point. > If that were to happen, then I would just explain to > them (as they already know) that it will take me X days > to deal with converting their site to a new browser. :) ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< ah yes, job security through vendor lockdown. sorry, but i still fail to see a reason to use javascript and a link to submit the form. it just causes way too many problems. better to leave the submit buttons alone or force them into your (or your client's) idea of a good-looking ui with css. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From rob.smith at THERMON.com Mon Nov 3 13:33:05 2003 From: rob.smith at THERMON.com (Rob Smith) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:33:05 -0600 Subject: [thelist] using character entities Message-ID: <0CEC8258A6E4D611BE5400306E1CC9271E5162@smtmb.tmc.local> Why? Because. Seriously though. I had a ` in my database the other day and for some odd reason it was spitting out a Chinese character. I hopped over to Babel fish and funny enough the character translated as "Crazy" in Chinese. Had I replace()d my ` with ´, I would have gotten a more exact response. There's some ammo, Rob From jeff at jeffhowden.com Mon Nov 3 13:43:06 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:43:06 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: tab, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: Tab Alleman > > Sometimes you have to use a link because you need to > dynamically generate it. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< how does a link make it any easier? how does a submit button make it any less possible? .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From cs1spw at bath.ac.uk Mon Nov 3 13:46:53 2003 From: cs1spw at bath.ac.uk (Simon Willison) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:46:53 -0600 Subject: [thelist] using character entities In-Reply-To: <20031103154114.46478.qmail@web12605.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031103154114.46478.qmail@web12605.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3FA6B0AD.1070304@bath.ac.uk> Tom Dell'Aringa wrote: > Just working on my HTML guidelines doc again for my department. I'm > on HTML character entities, and I'm trying to explain the reason why > you should use them (we are generally using XHTML transitional) in > our pages. > > I've been using them long enough, but for some reason I cannot come > up with the reason why. Sure, pages won't validate is a partial > reason, but not really a good one and not one that will be accepted > here. I feel as though I am missing the obvious but can't think of > it... If you're using XHTML transitional, your pages should be well-formed XML. The principle reason for using XHTML is that documents are XML and can thus be processed using XML tools (such as XPath and XSLT) - if your documents don't use HTML entities they won't be valid XML and the advantage of using XHTML is lost. Also, using entities garauntees compatibility with browsers and other user agents. Most browsers attempt to emulate IE's highly forgiving parsing of incorrect entities but since it's not part of any standard there's no garauntee that all browsers will get it right. -- Simon Willison Web development weblog: http://simon.incutio.com/ From kris at midtempo.net Mon Nov 3 13:52:28 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:52:28 +0000 Subject: [thelist] png in IE In-Reply-To: <0CEC8258A6E4D611BE5400306E1CC9271E5160@smtmb.tmc.local> Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031103195143.017f8c60@mail.btinternet.com> Rob wrote: >They don't render in some browsers as well >as the Asian browsers, at last check. Rob, can you elaborate as to what you mean by "Asian browsers"?? tia kris From lists at neoncowboy.com Mon Nov 3 14:09:02 2003 From: lists at neoncowboy.com (John Corry) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:09:02 -1000 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: The form is for a flower farmer to update the list of available flowers/varieties/colors. The flower farmer (NS 7/Win XP) is the only person using the form. He can see. He can hear. He has JavaScript turned on. The form is pretty long. I want to put an *optional* link elsewhere on the page from whence he can submit the form. There's a button too..but just one, at the bottom of the form. I don't need the onSubmit event. As far as I know, a submit button can only be in the form that is being submitted. That won't work, I need it in a whole different part of the page. Of course you're right .jeff, and maybe I won't do it this way, maybe I'll just sprinkle submit buttons throughout the form...but in the context I'm working in, using a link with submit() just is not that out of line. You'll notice that my original post did not say: 'Help, I need to be educated on the best way to balance accessibility and to know the best way to submit my form' I don't care about the dogma, I can figure that out on my own. Thanks. John Corry -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Howden Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 10:59 PM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: John Corry > > A form object's submit() method will not work if the form has an input > named 'submit'. > > Change the name of the submit button and you've got it. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< the submit() method is the lazy developer's way out of doing something the right way. never use it. instead, consider an alternate means of submitting the form, like say, including a submit button that *everyone* can use. beware of the submit() method. it won't cause the onsubmit event handler to fire. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From pixelmech at yahoo.com Mon Nov 3 12:53:06 2003 From: pixelmech at yahoo.com (Tom Dell'Aringa) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:53:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20031103185306.96353.qmail@web12606.mail.yahoo.com> --- Tab Alleman wrote: > Sometimes you have to use a link because you need to dynamically > generate it. So? Dynamically generate a submit button instead. Tom ===== http://www.pixelmech.com/ :: Web Development Services http://www.DMXzone.com/ :: JavaScript Author / Every Friday! http://www.thywordistruth.net/ :: Eternal Life "I'll ho ho and ha ha you!" (Daffy Duck) From hershelr at netvision.net.il Mon Nov 3 14:54:34 2003 From: hershelr at netvision.net.il (Hershel Robinson) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:54:34 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <008601c3a24c$b01bec20$0300000a@hershel2000> I did build a site that uses JS drop-down menus, built with links. Some of these menu choices submitted forms, some did not. > then what is the visually impaired user supposed to do? We don't have any. Would such a person one day want to use this particular site (a controlled audience site) he would have far greater problems than figuring out how to submit his form. Is the company concerned about the possibility that one day such a person will want to use this site? No. > ah yes, job security through vendor lockdown. Job security? Could be the exact opposite. Maybe someone who has NOT spent the past 2 years working primarily in this Win IE only environment would be better equipped to fix the site to work with other browsers. :) > sorry, but i still fail to see a reason to use javascript and > a link to > submit the form. it just causes way too many problems. > better to leave the > submit buttons alone or force them into your (or your > client's) idea of a > good-looking ui with css. I generally would agree that it is not a good choice. In the site mentioned above (with dropdowns) I had not thought of styling buttons to look like links and then adding some sort of mouseover or CSS behavior. Given our layout of dropdown menus, which are entirely in a different location (in the code and on the page) than the actual form, I don't see how buttons would be any better than links. Either one is not very friendly for a screen reader and both require JS code to make them work. Hershel From Tab.Alleman at MetroGuide.com Mon Nov 3 14:56:11 2003 From: Tab.Alleman at MetroGuide.com (Tab Alleman) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:56:11 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript Message-ID: Well that's true that a button can be dynamically created too.. But dammit, I know there've been times when I *had* to have a link that submitted a form, but now I can't remember why. Maybe it was just aesthetics after all. Part of it might have been that I once didn't know that a form could have multiple submit buttons, all with the same name, and whichever was clicked would send its name/value pair in the form object to the processing script. So in order to have the script handle the form differently depending on which button was clicked, I used a javascript function to populate a hidden input and then submit the form. It was the only way I knew how to tell which button was clicked, but now I know there's a better way. From cneppes at port80software.com Mon Nov 3 14:42:46 2003 From: cneppes at port80software.com (Chris Neppes) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:42:46 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen Message-ID: Kent, You should negotiate with client browser preferences, pre-sense their language preferences, and automatically serve the proper file with the correct language-type content. Here are some solutions based on Web server type: On IIS: www.pagexchanger.com http://www.port80software.com/products/pagexchanger/faq#question11 On Apache: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_negotiation.html If you would like some help getting started, let me know. Best, Chris :::::::::: :::::::::: Chris Neppes Port80 Software, Inc. www.port80software.com 5252 Balboa Ave., Ste. 605 San Diego, CA 92117 cneppes at port80software.com 858.268.7960 voice 619.733.7484 cell 858.268.7760 fax Web server modules for Microsoft IIS. security. performance. user experience. From rob.smith at THERMON.com Mon Nov 3 15:20:14 2003 From: rob.smith at THERMON.com (Rob Smith) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:20:14 -0600 Subject: [thelist] png in IE Message-ID: <0CEC8258A6E4D611BE5400306E1CC9271E5165@smtmb.tmc.local> Rob, can you elaborate as to what you mean by "Asian browsers"?? Pssst. This is where you step in Jay Blanchard and say it was a Chinese browser. Correct me if I'm wrong. I'd confirm the exact browser but that machine died about a year ago. Sorry, Rob From simon.perry at si-designs.co.uk Mon Nov 3 15:34:23 2003 From: simon.perry at si-designs.co.uk (Simon Perry) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:34:23 -0000 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript References: Message-ID: <00df01c3a252$3ff896e0$3100a8c0@xppro> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Corry" >The form is pretty long. I want to put an *optional* link elsewhere on the >page from whence he can submit the form. There's a button too..but just one, >at the bottom of the form. Am I missing something? Surely once you are in the form hitting enter at any point will submit it. No looking for submit it links, no extra buttons, no JavaScript, no messing with user expectations just a simple hit enter to submit this form at any time. If you only have one form on the page then open it after and close it just before , AFAIK this approach is perfectly valid mark-up as any element can reside within the form tags. At the very most the only thing you may need to do is one onfocus() call on page load to ensure the form is "live". Simon From jeff at jeffhowden.com Mon Nov 3 16:19:45 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:19:45 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <20031103200851.26335.10884@hm-mx1b.solinus.com> Message-ID: john, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: John Corry [mailto:lists at neoncowboy.com] > > The form is for a flower farmer to update the list of > available flowers/varieties/colors. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< excellent. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > The flower farmer (NS 7/Win XP) is the only person using > the form. > > He can see. He can hear. He has JavaScript turned on. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< until he reads an article about this evil thing called javascript and all its security problems and follows the instructions on how to disable it. then he's left with a link that no longer does what he expects. highly doubtful he'll equate his action with that reaction. instead, he'll come to you asking why it's stopped working. you *might* have the foresight to ask if javascript is enabled at which point you should hope he remembers he disabled it. if not, have fun. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > The form is pretty long. I want to put an *optional* > link elsewhere on the page from whence he can submit > the form. There's a button too..but just one, at the > bottom of the form. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< any reason you can't just move the
and
tags in order to encompass this optional link? ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > I don't need the onSubmit event. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< no, but when you do. time to re-engineer. this is avoidable though. don't use the submit() method. instead, call a click() event on the submit button when the link is clicked. now, no more problems with browsers and the submit() method and the onsubmit event handler will be there for you user later should you need it. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > As far as I know, a submit button can only be in the > form that is being submitted. That won't work, I need > it in a whole different part of the page. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< and is that part of the page wrapped in another form? if not, see above about moving the
or
tags to accommodate. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > Of course you're right .jeff, and maybe I won't do it > this way, maybe I'll just sprinkle submit buttons > throughout the form...but in the context I'm working in, > using a link with submit() just is not that out of line. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< you just brought up a good point though. if this "submit" link is somewhere else entirely on the page, then does it have any context with the form it's submitting? perhaps not. making it a link and not a submit button takes it even more out of context. sure, it's for a single user so you can chalk it up to user training, but that's the sort of design decision that comes back to haunt you. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > You'll notice that my original post did not say: > 'Help, I need to be educated on the best way to balance > accessibility and to know the best way to submit my > form' > > I don't care about the dogma, I can figure that out on > my own. Thanks. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< you can call it dogma if you like, but there's plenty of evidence to back up what i'm talking about. however, you get what you pay for. you asked for help and i countered with alternatives and why i thought they were better. you're free to do it whatever way you want, but you're going to have a difficult time legitimizing your current solution on thelist. if it works for you, fine, but i really don't want people to get the idea it's ok to use all over the place. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com Mon Nov 3 17:31:48 2003 From: sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com (Steve Abaffy) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:31:48 -0600 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Message-ID: Hello, I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my wits end. When I try to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the past year or so, it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing is I don't know, because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down as if has run into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and reinstalled it with no change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade but it does not recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any help as to why this might be happening would be appreciated. Thank you From jpeth at mac.com Mon Nov 3 17:31:24 2003 From: jpeth at mac.com (J. Anthony Peth) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:31:24 -0800 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Have you done anything different with fonts lately? Tony > From: Steve Abaffy > Reply-To: "thelist at lists.evolt.org" > Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:31:48 -0600 > To: Java > Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > Hello, > > I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my wits end. When I try > to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the past year or so, > it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing is I don't know, > because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down as if has run > into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and reinstalled it with no > change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade but it does not > recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any help as to why > this might be happening would be appreciated. > > Thank you > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! From nansmith at heritageconcord.org Mon Nov 3 17:42:46 2003 From: nansmith at heritageconcord.org (Nan Harbison) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:42:46 -0500 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Steve, Did you try uninstalling it and reinstalling it? This happened to me once with a program, I called tech support, they suggested doing this, and it worked. I forget what program it was, I don't think it was PS, but it is worth a try. Nan Behalf Of J. Anthony Peth Subject: Re: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Have you done anything different with fonts lately? Tony > From: Steve Abaffy > Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > Hello, > > I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my wits end. When I try > to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the past year or so, > it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing is I don't know, > because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down as if has run > into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and reinstalled it with no > change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade but it does not > recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any help as to why > this might be happening would be appreciated. > > Thank you From paul at teltest.com Mon Nov 3 18:21:02 2003 From: paul at teltest.com (Paul Bennett) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:21:02 +1300 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FA6F0EE.2000309@teltest.com> Nan Harbison wrote: >Steve, >Did you try uninstalling it and reinstalling it? This >happened to me once with a program, I called tech support, >they suggested doing this, and it worked. I forget what >program it was, I don't think it was PS, but it is worth a >try. >Nan > > was the program called "Windows"? :) Sorry - tip owed When working with print-oriented graphic designers don't be afraid to let them know when you see visuals that may cause headaches when laying sites out or building database-driven backends. Don't be afraid to politely educate graphic designers about standards, browser incompatibilites, and accessibility issues - graphic designers who are not familiar with the web simply may not relaise these issues exist. Also don't be afraid to listen when they want you to correct layout or visual issues. They may be print oriented, but they still know what works visually. > > > > -- ------------------------------ Paul Bennett Internet Developer Teltest Electronic Design ------------------------------ Email: paul at teltest.com Phone: 64 4 237 4557 Web: http://www.teltest.com Wap: http://wap.teltest.com From sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com Mon Nov 3 18:32:14 2003 From: sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com (Steve Abaffy) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:32:14 -0600 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: No nothing new with the fonts. I have not added any or deleted any. And I have un/reinstalled the program 4 times now.. with no change in behaviour. > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-bounces-sabaffy=mswebdevelopment.com at lists.evolt.org > [mailto:thelist-bounces-sabaffy=mswebdevelopment.com at lists.evolt.org]On > Behalf Of J. Anthony Peth > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:31 PM > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: Re: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > > Have you done anything different with fonts lately? > > Tony > > > > From: Steve Abaffy > > Reply-To: "thelist at lists.evolt.org" > > Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:31:48 -0600 > > To: Java > > Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > > > Hello, > > > > I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my wits > end. When I try > > to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the past > year or so, > > it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing is > I don't know, > > because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down as > if has run > > into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and > reinstalled it with no > > change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade > but it does not > > recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any > help as to why > > this might be happening would be appreciated. > > > > Thank you > > > > > > -- > > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > From lists at thinkbigideas.com Mon Nov 3 18:32:13 2003 From: lists at thinkbigideas.com (Anthony Baker > ThinkBigIdeas) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:32:13 -0800 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200311040032.hA40WNCB023038@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> Hey There, I've had the same problem with all my Adobe applications when installing them from my desktop (where they've worked fine) to my laptop. One suggestion, which I haven't yet tried -- but will tonight -- is that there may be a corrupted font causing the grief. I am going to uninstall all fonts except my system fonts and then try and boot it. As with you, all my filters and presets loaded. The crash appeared to happen when loading fonts. /Anthony | I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my | wits end. When I try | to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the | past year or so, | it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing | is I don't know, | because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down | as if has run | into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and | reinstalled it with no | change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade | but it does not | recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any | help as to why | this might be happening would be appreciated. | | Thank you From aholmes at pureguru.com Mon Nov 3 18:51:41 2003 From: aholmes at pureguru.com (Aaron Holmes) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:51:41 -0500 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: <200311040032.hA40WNCB023038@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> Message-ID: <000001c3a26d$d32d1d30$6600a8c0@gurixstation001> I can sadly say that I can confirm the same problems here. Adobe Photoshop 7 loads and immediately after splash screen exits, continually. Problem persists after multiple reinstalls, virus/malware scans and disk checks. The problem first occurred while Adobe Photoshop was in use. An unexpected termination of that application ensued and since then the problems noted have been experienced. I believe that it may very well be an issue with the fonts. However, are there any ideas as to why a particular font or set of fonts would suddenly malfunction (Windows corruption problems come to mind, although I'm more concerned as to whether or not Photoshop itself is the culprit)? Has anyone reported this to the Adobe developers as of yet? I've done a bit of searching and found the following (may not be of any use) http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?50 at 46.ELyeba32BEg.8@.1dea4f00 This one looks right on path and I'll be attempting things mentioned here next: http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?50 at 46.ELyeba32BEg.8@.1dea13f0 Hope this helps guys Sincerely yours, Aaron Holmes CEO Gurix Web Professionals Welland, Ontario Canada Corporate e-mail: aholmes at gurix.com V: 905.324.3241 F: 905.734.1398 http://www.gurix.com Subscribe to "Balancing Today's Technology," our free, monthly, electronic newsletter about using technology in business by e-mail to: join-todaystech at gurix.com -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Baker > ThinkBigIdeas Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:32 PM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Hey There, I've had the same problem with all my Adobe applications when installing them from my desktop (where they've worked fine) to my laptop. One suggestion, which I haven't yet tried -- but will tonight -- is that there may be a corrupted font causing the grief. I am going to uninstall all fonts except my system fonts and then try and boot it. As with you, all my filters and presets loaded. The crash appeared to happen when loading fonts. /Anthony | I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my | wits end. When I try | to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the | past year or so, | it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing | is I don't know, | because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down | as if has run | into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and | reinstalled it with no | change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade | but it does not | recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any | help as to why | this might be happening would be appreciated. | | Thank you -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From aholmes at pureguru.com Mon Nov 3 18:56:19 2003 From: aholmes at pureguru.com (Aaron Holmes) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:56:19 -0500 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: <200311040032.hA40WNCB023038@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> Message-ID: <000101c3a26e$79d4fe50$6600a8c0@gurixstation001> Good news all, Further to my prior email: The following has corrected all errors: 1. Load Adobe Photoshop 2. QUICKLY press Crtl+Alt+Shift on load to reset settings (right on load, and be fast - it took me several tries). Everything is back to normal now! Phew... Sincerely yours, Aaron Holmes CEO Gurix Web Professionals Welland, Ontario Canada Corporate e-mail: aholmes at gurix.com V: 905.324.3241 F: 905.734.1398 http://www.gurix.com Subscribe to "Balancing Today's Technology," our free, monthly, electronic newsletter about using technology in business by e-mail to: join-todaystech at gurix.com -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Baker > ThinkBigIdeas Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:32 PM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Hey There, I've had the same problem with all my Adobe applications when installing them from my desktop (where they've worked fine) to my laptop. One suggestion, which I haven't yet tried -- but will tonight -- is that there may be a corrupted font causing the grief. I am going to uninstall all fonts except my system fonts and then try and boot it. As with you, all my filters and presets loaded. The crash appeared to happen when loading fonts. /Anthony | I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my | wits end. When I try | to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the | past year or so, | it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing | is I don't know, | because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down | as if has run | into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and | reinstalled it with no | change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade | but it does not | recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any | help as to why | this might be happening would be appreciated. | | Thank you -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com Mon Nov 3 19:20:49 2003 From: sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com (Steve Abaffy) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:20:49 -0600 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: <000101c3a26e$79d4fe50$6600a8c0@gurixstation001> Message-ID: Yes that did fix it... Thanks very much... > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org > [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Aaron Holmes > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:56 PM > To: lists at thinkbigideas.com; thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > > Good news all, > > Further to my prior email: > > The following has corrected all errors: > > 1. Load Adobe Photoshop > 2. QUICKLY press Crtl+Alt+Shift on load to reset settings (right > on load, and be fast - it took me several tries). > > Everything is back to normal now! Phew... > > > Sincerely yours, > > Aaron Holmes > CEO > Gurix Web Professionals > Welland, Ontario > Canada > > Corporate e-mail: aholmes at gurix.com > > V: 905.324.3241 > F: 905.734.1398 > http://www.gurix.com > > Subscribe to "Balancing Today's Technology," our free, monthly, > electronic newsletter about using technology in business by e-mail to: > join-todaystech at gurix.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org > [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Baker > > ThinkBigIdeas > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:32 PM > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > > Hey There, > > I've had the same problem with all my Adobe applications when > installing them from my desktop (where they've worked fine) > to my laptop. > > One suggestion, which I haven't yet tried -- but will tonight -- > is that there may be a corrupted font causing the grief. I am > going to uninstall all fonts except my system fonts and then > try and boot it. > > As with you, all my filters and presets loaded. The crash > appeared to happen when loading fonts. > > > /Anthony > > > > | I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my > | wits end. When I try > | to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the > | past year or so, > | it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing > | is I don't know, > | because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down > | as if has run > | into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and > | reinstalled it with no > | change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade > | but it does not > | recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any > | help as to why > | this might be happening would be appreciated. > | > | Thank you > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > From sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com Mon Nov 3 19:28:49 2003 From: sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com (Steve Abaffy) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:28:49 -0600 Subject: [thelist] OT: Saving Transparent Gifs was Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: <000101c3a26e$79d4fe50$6600a8c0@gurixstation001> Message-ID: Ok now that we have the photoshop won't open problem solved... I have a new one. I went to save a file through the Save for Web function and made a color transparent and said save... and I get the following error "Could not complete this operation because an assertion has failed" of course it doesn't tell you what assertion. I have PS loaded on a different machine and do not have this problem on the other machine... Not sure what to look at to see what is different on the two machines... Again any help with this would be appreciated. From paul at teltest.com Mon Nov 3 19:32:07 2003 From: paul at teltest.com (Paul Bennett) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:32:07 +1300 Subject: [thelist] OT: Saving Transparent Gifs was Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FA70197.6080008@teltest.com> Steve Abaffy wrote: >Ok now that we have the photoshop won't open problem solved... I have a new >one. I went to save a file through the Save for Web function and made a >color transparent and said save... and I get the following error "Could not >complete this operation because an assertion has failed" ... > > I have PS 5.5, so this may / may not be of help Sometimes the "save for web" function fails for me when there is not much RAM available on my machine. I close some other running programs, try "save for web" again, and presto - file saves. Odd, but it works everytime -- ------------------------------ Paul Bennett Internet Developer Teltest Electronic Design ------------------------------ Email: paul at teltest.com Phone: 64 4 237 4557 Web: http://www.teltest.com Wap: http://wap.teltest.com From sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com Mon Nov 3 20:17:15 2003 From: sabaffy at mswebdevelopment.com (Steve Abaffy) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:17:15 -0600 Subject: [thelist] OT: Saving Transparent Gifs was Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: <3FA70197.6080008@teltest.com> Message-ID: Tried that, closed every application down with the exception of PS was using about 25% of the 256M of available ram and still could not save the gif... but at least we eliminated that as a possiblility... thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org > [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Paul Bennett > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:32 PM > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: Re: [thelist] OT: Saving Transparent Gifs was Photoshop won't > open > > > Steve Abaffy wrote: > > >Ok now that we have the photoshop won't open problem solved... I > have a new > >one. I went to save a file through the Save for Web function and made a > >color transparent and said save... and I get the following error > "Could not > >complete this operation because an assertion has failed" ... > > > > > I have PS 5.5, so this may / may not be of help > > Sometimes the "save for web" function fails for me when there is not > much RAM available on my machine. > I close some other running programs, try "save for web" again, and > presto - file saves. > > Odd, but it works everytime > > -- > ------------------------------ > Paul Bennett > Internet Developer > Teltest Electronic Design > ------------------------------ > Email: paul at teltest.com > Phone: 64 4 237 4557 > Web: http://www.teltest.com > Wap: http://wap.teltest.com > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > From brian.j.boerner at lmco.com Mon Nov 3 20:19:50 2003 From: brian.j.boerner at lmco.com (Boerner, Brian J) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:19:50 -0500 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Message-ID: maybe this is obvious? windows PS users only : whenever PS is giving me a headache it's usually related to temp files especially if you had a crash or two on huge files, every once in a while check it out - the temps don't get deleted unless you have a normal quit out of the program, and the file sizes can eat monsterous portions of RAM -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Steve Abaffy Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:21 PM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Yes that did fix it... Thanks very much... > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org > [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Aaron Holmes > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:56 PM > To: lists at thinkbigideas.com; thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > > Good news all, > > Further to my prior email: > > The following has corrected all errors: > > 1. Load Adobe Photoshop > 2. QUICKLY press Crtl+Alt+Shift on load to reset settings (right > on load, and be fast - it took me several tries). > > Everything is back to normal now! Phew... > > > Sincerely yours, > > Aaron Holmes > CEO > Gurix Web Professionals > Welland, Ontario > Canada > > Corporate e-mail: aholmes at gurix.com > > V: 905.324.3241 > F: 905.734.1398 > http://www.gurix.com > > Subscribe to "Balancing Today's Technology," our free, monthly, > electronic newsletter about using technology in business by e-mail to: > join-todaystech at gurix.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org > [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Baker > > ThinkBigIdeas > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:32 PM > To: thelist at lists.evolt.org > Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > > Hey There, > > I've had the same problem with all my Adobe applications when > installing them from my desktop (where they've worked fine) > to my laptop. > > One suggestion, which I haven't yet tried -- but will tonight -- > is that there may be a corrupted font causing the grief. I am > going to uninstall all fonts except my system fonts and then > try and boot it. > > As with you, all my filters and presets loaded. The crash > appeared to happen when loading fonts. > > > /Anthony > > > > | I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my > | wits end. When I try > | to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the > | past year or so, > | it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing > | is I don't know, > | because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down > | as if has run > | into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and > | reinstalled it with no > | change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade > | but it does not > | recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any > | help as to why > | this might be happening would be appreciated. > | > | Thank you > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! > > -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From lists at thinkbigideas.com Mon Nov 3 21:39:20 2003 From: lists at thinkbigideas.com (Anthony Baker > ThinkBigIdeas) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:39:20 -0800 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200311040339.hA43dVCB026304@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> Yeah, but does this apply if you've never even gotten a clean start? My install of Photoshop 7.0 on my laptop never booted. Same with Illustrator 10. It worked initially (in both instances), but failed following an upgrade to Adobe Acrobat 6.0 -- at least that's what I think happened. Also, of course, I moved over a ton of fonts from my desktop and copied them to my laptop. /Anthony | -----Original Message----- | From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org | [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Boerner, Brian J | Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:20 PM | To: thelist at lists.evolt.org | Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open | | maybe this is obvious? | windows PS users only : whenever PS is giving me a headache | it's usually | related to temp files | | especially if you had a crash or two on huge files, every once in a | while check it out - the temps don't get deleted unless you have a | normal quit out of the program, and the file sizes can eat monsterous | portions of RAM From brian.j.boerner at lmco.com Mon Nov 3 21:56:56 2003 From: brian.j.boerner at lmco.com (Boerner, Brian J) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:56:56 -0500 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Message-ID: it does - at least for PS the temp file gets created as soon as you initiate it... & gets larger depending on prefs set for history panel etc. to be fair it has been a b1tch only a time or two, usually when i'm too rushed to remember the temp directory. that history panel can KILL you, make sure to set the prefs to less than 10 steps back. it sounds like you had another issue but I wanted to bring that to light for infrequent Photoshop users -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Anthony Baker > ThinkBigIdeas Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:39 PM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open Yeah, but does this apply if you've never even gotten a clean start? My install of Photoshop 7.0 on my laptop never booted. Same with Illustrator 10. It worked initially (in both instances), but failed following an upgrade to Adobe Acrobat 6.0 -- at least that's what I think happened. Also, of course, I moved over a ton of fonts from my desktop and copied them to my laptop. /Anthony | -----Original Message----- | From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org | [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Boerner, Brian J | Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:20 PM | To: thelist at lists.evolt.org | Subject: RE: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open | | maybe this is obvious? | windows PS users only : whenever PS is giving me a headache | it's usually | related to temp files | | especially if you had a crash or two on huge files, every once in a | while check it out - the temps don't get deleted unless you have a | normal quit out of the program, and the file sizes can eat monsterous | portions of RAM -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From raskenbo at fastmail.fm Mon Nov 3 22:02:50 2003 From: raskenbo at fastmail.fm (Ken Chase) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:02:50 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen In-Reply-To: <04e901c3a22d$79234b10$ef49fea9@DELL4500> References: <20031103162656.2922.qmail@smtp1.wedohosting.com> <04e901c3a22d$79234b10$ef49fea9@DELL4500> Message-ID: <20031104040250.A39CC3FAF9@server1.messagingengine.com> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:11:08 -0500, "Norman Bunn" said: > Finally, I > would avoid the splash page altogether. Since most web sites are in > English, it should not offend someone if it starts that way, and if it > starts in French, I would not be offended either; I'd just look for the > "English" option button. Using/not using a splash page is one thing. However, being from a bilingual country, I know that a large and vocal group would be offended by one language being the "default" over another. It may in fact go against Government policy. If permitted I think that the best solution is to offer both (all) languages on the "home" page with the option to "switch" languages on every page. On the other hand, It really depends on who your target audience is, who the site is for (policy/laws) and what country you're from. My 2 cents, kenbo From lists at neoncowboy.com Tue Nov 4 02:11:54 2003 From: lists at neoncowboy.com (John Corry) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:11:54 -1000 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > excellent. Yes, it is. > then he's left with a link that no longer does what he > expects. And a submit button that does exactly what he expects, and an enter key that also submits the form. > any reason you can't just move the
and
tags in > order to encompass this optional link? Yes, well...not 'can't', but there are reasons it's difficult and impractical. All of the pages in the site, including the admin section, are generated by php. Common page elements (navigation, header, footer) are returned by php functions (which work similarly to includes). I'm afraid that conditionally writing the
tag on the page where it will be used (which is what will be required to place it outside of the main content ) would just make the code difficult to read and understand. It's a lot cleaner to keep the tag where there's a form. > ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > I don't need the onSubmit event. > ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > no, but when you do. time to re-engineer. OK, yes. If I ever use the onSubmit handler, I'll have to reengineer. > this is avoidable though. don't use the submit() method. > instead, call a > click() event on the submit button when the link is clicked. Wait...what? I can do: Document.formName.submitInputButtonName.click() ? And that acts the same as the submit button being clicked? How's that work? I didn't know I could do that. John From jeff at jeffhowden.com Tue Nov 4 02:38:00 2003 From: jeff at jeffhowden.com (Jeff Howden) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:38:00 -0800 Subject: [thelist] Submitting a form with javascript In-Reply-To: <20031104081144.18433.6215@hm-mx1b.solinus.com> Message-ID: john, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: John Corry [mailto:lists at neoncowboy.com] > > > then he's left with a link that no longer does what he > > expects. > > And a submit button that does exactly what he expects, > and an enter key that also submits the form. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< sure, but once a ui element is there and he becomes accustomed to it, it'll be catastrophic (to him) when it stops working. if doesn't become catastrophic then i'd question the need for the link. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > any reason you can't just move the and > > tags in order to encompass this optional link? > > Yes, well...not 'can't', but there are reasons it's > difficult and impractical. > > All of the pages in the site, including the admin > section, are generated by php. Common page elements > (navigation, header, footer) are returned by php > functions (which work similarly to includes). I'm > afraid that conditionally writing the
tag on the > page where it will be used (which is what will be > required to place it outside of the main content ) > would just make the code difficult to read and > understand. > > It's a lot cleaner to keep the tag where there's > a form. ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< it'd be less messy than writing some conditional code to determine whether or not to show the link? ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > > this is avoidable though. don't use the submit() > > method. instead, call a click() event on the submit > > button when the link is clicked. > > Wait...what? > I can do: > Document.formName.submitInputButtonName.click() ? And > that acts the same as the submit button being clicked? ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< yes, except it's "document", not "Document". personally, i'd still question the need for the link though. .jeff ------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Howden - Web Application Specialist Resume - http://jeffhowden.com/about/resume/ Code Library - http://evolt.jeffhowden.com/jeff/code/ From kris at midtempo.net Tue Nov 4 04:05:25 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:05:25 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [mysql] condensing queries Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031104095613.00aef1a8@mail.btinternet.com> hiya i've got a number of mysql queries on a page that i'm thinking i should condense into one. firstly, is it a good idea to create a single, but more complex query - or should i stick to several simple ones? secondly, if two queries are getting count results from different tables, if the answer to the above is yes, how would i go about amalgamating them? for instance: $sql1 = "select count(image_id) as imagecount from images where user = '$user' "; and $sql2 = "select count(link_id) as link count from links where user = '$user' "; simply combining them as: $sql = "select count(i.image_id) as imagecount, count(l.link_id) as linkcount from images i, links l where i.user = '$user' and l.user = '$user'"; returns the value of images*links, rather than the independent values. can someone explain what i'm doing wrong? tia kris From ashiel at sportsinteraction.com Tue Nov 4 04:52:14 2003 From: ashiel at sportsinteraction.com (Drew Shiel) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:52:14 +0000 Subject: [thelist] XSL / XPath Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104105130.03304bb8@mail.sportsinteraction.com> Here's a chunk of XML: 2003 World Cup - Outright New Zealand England Australia France I'm trying to work out the XSL/XPath stuff to say "Take the first two runner nodes and do THIS with them", where THIS is dropping some of the values into a HTML table. Anyone able to explain it? The XPath things have me baffled. Drew. Drew Shiel, Web Development, Sports Interaction ashiel at sportsinteraction.com http://www.sportsinteraction.com/ +353-1-2365701 (Direct Line) From and-evolt at doxdesk.com Tue Nov 4 04:42:36 2003 From: and-evolt at doxdesk.com (Andrew Clover) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:42:36 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [mysql] condensing queries In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20031104095613.00aef1a8@mail.btinternet.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20031104095613.00aef1a8@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <20031104104236.GA31234@doxdesk.com> kris burford wrote: > firstly, is it a good idea to create a single, but more complex query - or > should i stick to several simple ones? If there is shared work done by both queries (eg. a subselect) there is a case for combining them. (Trading off against code readability etc.) This is not the case here: > $sql1 = "select count(image_id) as imagecount from images where user = > '$user' "; > $sql2 = "select count(link_id) as linkcount from links where user = > '$user' "; The DBMS must go through both tables separately looking for matching user columns; there is no optimisation where it can check both tables at once. > simply combining them as: $sql = "select count(i.image_id) as imagecount, > count(l.link_id) as linkcount from images i, links l where i.user = '$user' > and l.user = '$user'"; > returns the value of images*links Yes. The 'FROM x, y' clause doesn't 'add' the rows from x to the rows of y: it forms a join where every possible row in x is joined to every possible row in y. Normally you then restrict the join with a WHERE clause to select only rows that are actually related. Otherwise you just end up with an enormous (x*y) table. Then either of your 'count' clauses just total up the number of rows in the great big join table. Stick with the two queries, but: > "where user = '$user' "; Careful with that. Unless you're using magic quotes (which is in general not a good thing at all), apostrophes and backslashes in the $user name can cause you trouble. Look at eg. mysql_[real_]escape_string for stuff like this. -- Andrew Clover mailto:and at doxdesk.com http://www.doxdesk.com/ From kris at midtempo.net Tue Nov 4 05:08:00 2003 From: kris at midtempo.net (kris burford) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:08:00 +0000 Subject: [thelist] [mysql] condensing queries In-Reply-To: <20031104104236.GA31234@doxdesk.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20031104095613.00aef1a8@mail.btinternet.com> <4.2.0.58.20031104095613.00aef1a8@mail.btinternet.com> Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031104110415.0183fdb0@mail.btinternet.com> > > firstly, is it a good idea to create a single, but more complex query - or > > should i stick to several simple ones? > >If there is shared work done by both queries (eg. a subselect) there is a >case for combining them. (Trading off against code readability etc.) ok, that makes a lot of sense. > > "where user = '$user' "; > >Careful with that. Unless you're using magic quotes (which is in general not >a good thing at all), apostrophes and backslashes in the $user name can >cause you trouble. Look at eg. mysql_[real_]escape_string for stuff like >this. actually, this was a simplified example. in reality the $user reference is a base64 encoded unique string which only the database has access to. but thanks for the warning. kris From chris.price at speed-mail.co.uk Tue Nov 4 06:14:21 2003 From: chris.price at speed-mail.co.uk (Chris Price) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:14:21 +0000 Subject: [thelist] FormMail Message-ID: I wonder if anyone can help me. I have attempted to install NMS FormMail Version 3.09c1 and I am getting nowhere with the debugging. I'm not familiar with Perl or cgi scripts generally and the error output is puzzling me. It says there is a parse error in "use strict" When I take that out it throws a wobbly at "use vars" It doesn't seem to like qw() so I've replaced them with ('','') The rest of the errors are to do with the non-user-serviceable section so either the script is faulty or the server uses a queer setup. No doubt you'll need more info but the (truncated) error output is: parse error at line 11, next 2 tokens "use strict" parse error at line 159, next token "}" parse error at line 1127, next 2 tokens "local $SIG" parse error at line 1127, next 2 tokens "CGI:" parse error at line 1861, next token "}" parse error at line 1867, next 2 tokens "CGI:" parse error at line 2049, next token "}" parse error at line 2055, next 2 tokens "CGI:" parse error at line 2955, next token "}" parse error at line 2961, next 2 tokens "CGI:" -- Chris Price From burgan at iprimus.com.au Tue Nov 4 06:54:15 2003 From: burgan at iprimus.com.au (Tim Burgan) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:24:15 +1030 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code Message-ID: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> hello, i cannot provide an example - but previously, i've seen web developer (who i hired to create a javascript function for me 2 years ago) hide the source code on a site that he had me view the work for approval. i.e. when i clicked 'view source' it was just a blank file - no matter what i tried - it was hidden i'm now learning client side and server side scripting for myself and starting my own business. i would love to use this technique in the approval stages of development. does anyone know how this is done? i'm happy for you to reply to me privately if this is a trade secret - or how can i find more information on doing such a thing? thank you very much for your time tim burgan From kverens at contactjuggling.org Tue Nov 4 08:58:06 2003 From: kverens at contactjuggling.org (Kae Verens) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:58:06 +0000 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> References: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> Message-ID: <3FA7BE7E.6000004@contactjuggling.org> Tim Burgan wrote: >hello, > >i cannot provide an example - but previously, i've seen web developer (who i >hired to create a javascript function for me 2 years ago) hide the source code >on a site that he had me view the work for approval. > >i.e. when i clicked 'view source' it was just a blank file - no matter what i >tried - it was hidden > >i'm now learning client side and server side scripting for myself and starting >my own business. i would love to use this technique in the approval stages of >development. > >does anyone know how this is done? > >i'm happy for you to reply to me privately if this is a trade secret - or how >can i find more information on doing such a thing? > >thank you very much for your time > >tim burgan > > > it's impossible to do that. you must have missed somrthing. please give us a url. kae From evolt at david.us-lot.org Tue Nov 4 07:05:35 2003 From: evolt at david.us-lot.org (David Dorward) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:05:35 +0000 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> Message-ID: <945E46CE-0EC7-11D8-8236-000A957E4F00@david.us-lot.org> On Tuesday, Nov 4, 2003, at 12:54 Europe/London, Tim Burgan wrote: > i cannot provide an example - but previously, i've seen web developer > (who i > hired to create a javascript function for me 2 years ago) hide the > source code > on a site that he had me view the work for approval. http://dorward.me.uk/www/hide/ > > i.e. when i clicked 'view source' it was just a blank file - no matter > what i > tried - it was hidden Did you try scrolling down? -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ From jay.blanchard at niicommunications.com Tue Nov 4 07:10:47 2003 From: jay.blanchard at niicommunications.com (Jay Blanchard) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 07:10:47 -0600 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code Message-ID: [snip] does anyone know how this is done? [/snip] Apparently Google does - hiding HTML source code.... How to Hide Your HTML Source! ... Here's the real lowdown on hiding your source code: ... difficult for people to view your source code, you cannot ... disable right-click or encrypting the HTML may be ... www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm - 20k - Cached - Similar pages Re: hide html source code? from dreamwvr on 1999-01-12 (www-html ... ... Also try 'hiding html code' I really can't remember as it was a ... This message : [ Message body ]; Next message : Roberto hernandez: "Re: hide html source code?"; ... lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ www-html/1999Jan/0106.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages Re: hide html source code? from Ian Hickson on 1999-01-11 (www- ... ... There is no way of hiding HTML markup (not code) from users ... Next message : Walter Ian Kaye: "Re: hide html source code?"; Previous message : ptorr at vantsys.com.au ... lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ www-html/1999Jan/0089.html - 8k - Cached - Similar pages [ More results from lists.w3.org ] How can i hide the html source code from the browser view source ... ... can't, but depending on your goal in hiding the code ... you want it, you could run the HTML through a ... of other creative methods for obscuring your source, but keep ... forums.devshed.com/archive/17/2001/7/2/9571 - 73k - Cached - Similar pages Hiding HTML code from Browsers on selecting "view source" Hiding HTML code from Browsers on selecting "view source". ... Spookster. Read Related Topics. Hiding HTML code from Browsers on selecting "view source". ... forums.devshed.com/archive/1/1999/12/2/993 - 8k - Cached - Similar pages [ More results from forums.devshed.com ] WWWBoard New Message: Message 136: Hiding Source Code ... source code yaqoob Posted at: 02/26/03 (1): Re: Hide HTML source code Balaji Posted ... Roshan Posted at: 01/04/03 (0): Re: Hiding Source Code TaNNkoST Posted at: 03 ... bassocantante.com/bbs/messages/136.html - 13k - Cached - Similar pages WWWBoard New Message: Message 157: Re: Hiding Source Code ... you have all the source code ... then you can manually download all pictures etc... : sorry ;-) : : I've been asked several times about hiding html code. ... bassocantante.com/bbs/messages/157.html - 12k - Cached - Similar pages [ More results from bassocantante.com ] Hidden HTML Source Code ... And now for the sermon... For the record, it's my opinion that the practice of hiding web page source code is a misguided effort. ... www.drpeterjones.com/hidden/hidden.php - 13k - Cached - Similar pages [thelist] Hiding source code [thelist] Hiding source code. ... the graphics wizs had created something which was much harder in html). ... badly that they might want to hide the source too ;-)) My ... lists.evolt.org/archive/Week-of-Mon-20030602/ 141871.html - 6k - Cached - Similar pages [thelist] Hiding source code ... Hiding source code; Next message: [thelist] Hiding source code; ... The question was about the source, the markup ... Even the crapiest html source might display nicely ... lists.evolt.org/archive/Week-of-Mon-20030526/ 141810.html - 4k - Cached - Similar pages [ More results from lists.evolt.org ] + several more pages of answers From simon.perry at si-designs.co.uk Tue Nov 4 07:24:07 2003 From: simon.perry at si-designs.co.uk (Simon Perry) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:24:07 -0000 Subject: [thelist] FormMail References: Message-ID: <014801c3a2d6$eccaf190$3100a8c0@xppro> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Price" > I wonder if anyone can help me. > > I have attempted to install NMS FormMail Version 3.09c1 and I am getting > nowhere with the debugging. I'm not familiar with Perl or cgi scripts > generally and the error output is puzzling me. > > It says there is a parse error in "use strict" > When I take that out it throws a wobbly at "use vars" > It doesn't seem to like qw() so I've replaced them with ('','') > Hi Chris I am not sure that this is the best place to ask [1] but here goes anyway. What platform / version of Perl are you running the script on? What platform / editors are you using to edit the script? My guesses are that you are using windoze / notepad to edit the script and have introduced windows hidden chars (line breaks etc) into the script that Linux/Unix servers will not like. You may also have introduced problems during ftp if the transfer mode is not set to ASCII. Then there are the RTFM like comments as qw() is explained towards the bottom of the nms readme [2]. Simon [1] nms list and archives http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/support.html [2] http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/formmail_compat-3.09c1/README From Ed at ComSimplicity.com Tue Nov 4 07:24:42 2003 From: Ed at ComSimplicity.com (Ed McCarroll) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 05:24:42 -0800 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> Message-ID: Tim, > i.e. when i clicked 'view source' it was just a blank file - no > matter what i tried - it was hidden (just my $0.02) I wouldn't invest a lot of time in this. If the file is HTML, it can be opened with any HTML editor, word processor, or text editor. Turning off the "View Source" command will only serve to slow down those who are far too under-skilled to steal your work in the first place. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From figural at btopenworld.com Tue Nov 4 07:25:55 2003 From: figural at btopenworld.com (Pauline Caldwell) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:25:55 +0000 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> Message-ID: At 12:54 pm +1030 Tim Burgan said >hello, > >i cannot provide an example - but previously, i've seen web developer (who i >hired to create a javascript function for me 2 years ago) hide the source code >on a site that he had me view the work for approval. The definitive answer? http://lemurzone.com/edit/converse53.htm Pauline --------------- ?The trouble with the French is that they don?t have a word for ?entrepreneur??. -President George W. Bush. From Brian at hondaswap.com Tue Nov 4 07:45:42 2003 From: Brian at hondaswap.com (Brian Cummiskey) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:45:42 -0500 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000a01c3a2d9$f3f5efd0$e6dffea9@breal> >> The definitive answer? >> http://lemurzone.com/edit/converse53.htm :D "4. Destroy the harddrive by using a 18 LB sledge hammer." Sadly, that is true. While it can be encrypted, and can be "hidden", as said, its only a speed bump. You can't hide what something has to read to display to you in the first place. From pixelmech at yahoo.com Tue Nov 4 07:58:44 2003 From: pixelmech at yahoo.com (Tom Dell'Aringa) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 05:58:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20031104135844.35701.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> --- At 12:54 pm +1030 Tim Burgan said > > i've seen web developer... hide the source code > > on a site that he had me view the work for approval. --- Pauline Caldwell wrote: > The definitive answer? > > http://lemurzone.com/edit/converse53.htm +1 Why would you want to hide your source? What is so unique about your HTML source that you feel the need to hide it? Honestly, the answer is nothing. There is nothing so unique or special about ANY - ANY HTML code that it should be hidden. The best know HTML authors on the net that truly do cutting edge work - Douglas Bowman comes to mind - have their source freely available to anyone who wants it. In fact, they encourage it. If this is a boss directing you to do this, I would attempt to educate him on the matter - mainly the point that there isn't anything worth protecting in the HTML. I've seen sites that have done it in IE. All I do is open it in Mozilla/NS and bang, there it is. There are plenty of other ways to get it. Tom ===== http://www.pixelmech.com/ :: Web Development Services http://www.DMXzone.com/ :: JavaScript Author / Every Friday! http://www.thywordistruth.net/ :: Eternal Life "I'll ho ho and ha ha you!" (Daffy Duck) From psm2713 at hotmail.com Tue Nov 4 08:07:35 2003 From: psm2713 at hotmail.com (Ken Moore) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 07:07:35 -0700 Subject: [thelist] [mysql] condensing queries Message-ID: Hi all, You wrote: >firstly, is it a good idea to create a single, but more complex query - or >should i stick to several simple ones? As a database programmer of 20 years, I can tell you that KISS is the plan to follow. Keep it as simple as possible for several reasons. 1. Two or three simple queries can completed in less time than complex queries. In MS SQL, for example, a badky designed query can take many, many times as long as the shorter queries to do the same thing. 2. You can combine or reuse the simple queries in different ways. 3. Some progammers are like stunt drivers (or C++ programmers) in that they think the more complicated, the more un-readable, the closer to an accident you can come without havint one, the better you are. I do not agree. 4. 6 months from now, you or someone else may want to read it and actually understand it. Ken - Who has misled myself too often. _________________________________________________________________ Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account is over limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es From psm2713 at hotmail.com Tue Nov 4 08:15:27 2003 From: psm2713 at hotmail.com (Ken Moore) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 07:15:27 -0700 Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice Message-ID: Dan Romanchik wrote >Finding salespeople is hard. You got that right. >What you have to do is sell (there's that four-letter word again) someone >that the potential you are >offering is worth the risk they'll have to take. I think I can do that >Let us know how it goes... I got some off list answers and will respond in the next day or two. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ken Moore" >To: >Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:41 AM >Subject: [thelist] Marketer/Marketing Advice > > > > Hi all, > > > > I need some advice marketing advice. I have developed some website-based > > services for insurance agents. The agents that have the services think >that > > they are great and that they will very much help the bottom line. > > > > The problem is that I cannot sell foot warmers to Eskimos. I need >someone >to > > do the marketing. There is a very great income potential for the right > > company or person. > > > > Where do I go to look for someone or some company that can do that? > > > > You can answer either on or off of the list at psm2713 at hotmail.com > > > > TIA, > > > > Ken > > _________________________________________________________________ Crave some Miles Davis or Grateful Dead? Your old favorites are always playing on MSN Radio Plus. Trial month free! http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio From seyon at delime.com Tue Nov 4 08:35:06 2003 From: seyon at delime.com (Marc Seyon) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:35:06 -0400 Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code In-Reply-To: <001901c3a2d2$c1a8c180$fa5e32d2@timburgan> Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20031104102937.00a75120@mail.delime.com> Message from Tim Burgan (11/4/2003 11:24 PM) >i'm now learning client side and server side scripting for myself and starting >my own business. i would love to use this technique in the approval stages of >development. In the "approval" stages of development, consider doing only screenshots/mock up images in photoshop rather than actual coding. Why start writing code before you get paid in the first place? If your response is "the clients need to click around to see how things work", do multiple screenshots and walk them through it like a storyboard. I'm sure you are aware of that running a business requires its own special set of skills quite separate from client side and server side scripting. A great book you can maybe take a look at is The Geek's Guide to Internet Business Success by Bob Schmidt. Good luck. regards. -marc -- Carnival 2003 in all its photographic glory. Playyuhself.com http://www.playyuhself.com/ From Ben_Gustafson at lionbridge.com Tue Nov 4 09:22:35 2003 From: Ben_Gustafson at lionbridge.com (Ben Gustafson) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:22:35 -0500 Subject: [thelist] Re: Language Detection vrs. Splash Screen Message-ID: <23CCDFA7793EEB4EBFBA56EE4044A9BB02D2CD4D@FRA-FORMULA> > Using/not using a splash page is one thing. However, being > from a bilingual country, I know that a large and vocal group > would be offended by one language being the "default" over > another. Huh? Think about that for a second. How exactly would not having a default language work? If a site was in English and French, and your browser language preference was set to German, which language would be displayed? Esperanto? None? I think the "large and vocal group" needs to get over itself. > It may in fact go against Government policy. Same for the Government. --Ben From jpeth at synapsedesign.com Mon Nov 3 17:30:59 2003 From: jpeth at synapsedesign.com (J. Anthony Peth) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:30:59 -0800 Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Have you done anything different with fonts lately? Tony > From: Steve Abaffy > Reply-To: "thelist at lists.evolt.org" > Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:31:48 -0600 > To: Java > Subject: [thelist] OT: Photoshop won't open > > Hello, > > I apologize for the off topic question, but I am at my wits end. When I try > to open photoshop 7.0, which has been working fine for the past year or so, > it gets to the loading brushes then whatever the next thing is I don't know, > because as soon as it starts to do it the program shuts down as if has run > into an unrecoverable error. So I uninstalled it, and reinstalled it with no > change in behaviour. I then tried to apply the 7.0.1 upgrade but it does not > recognize that photoshop is even loaded on the machine. Any help as to why > this might be happening would be appreciated. > > Thank you > > > -- > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! From r.mulder at mta.nl Tue Nov 4 05:21:47 2003 From: r.mulder at mta.nl (Roel Mulder) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:21:47 +0100 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104121032.00a73f30@mta.nl> Hi all, In januari 2003 we registered a .com domain. Yesterday we received an e-mail of someone claiming they registered it prior to ourselves and wanting to open up negotiations towards reclaiming it. > Unfortunately due to techincial problems between the original registrar (corp1) > and corp2 Ltd we were unable to reregister the domain when it was due for > renewal and it now seems that you have registered the domain. Tough for them. Question : Is there a place where I can check their claim of the domainname being registered to them prior our registration? The domain has since januari been directed to one of our websites, it doesn't generate tarffic worth mentioning, we haven't received any mail (spam included) so _if_ they ever had it registered they haven't used it. Google's cash won't help. Anyone? Thanks, Roel Mulder From Jon.Kiddy at RoswellPark.org Tue Nov 4 09:44:11 2003 From: Jon.Kiddy at RoswellPark.org (Kiddy, Jon) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:44:11 -0500 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration Message-ID: <97101976F8A044468CA74FE11883B90E031A8511@VISTA.roswellpark.org> >Question : Is there a place where I can check their claim of the domainname >being registered to them prior our registration? >Roel Mulder Not sure how you would verify this. But you could try the "WayBackMachine": http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.yahoo.com -Jon From sam at sam-i-am.com Tue Nov 4 09:52:07 2003 From: sam at sam-i-am.com (Sam-I-Am) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:52:07 -0600 Subject: [thelist] HomeSite 5/Access Violation? In-Reply-To: <20031028185235.60059.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031028185235.60059.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3FA7CB27.2090102@sam-i-am.com> I've started getting a similar error recently as I've been using Timbuktu to work remotely (our x-browser test station is the other side of the room and it saves me running back and forth). Any time I tried to open a file or replace - or apparently anything that would cause the creation of a new window - I would get the error. Interestingly, yesterday I got the same and closed the application remotely, and started it up again (also remotely) and never had the problem again. I'm running 4.5 on win2k. Sam >>But despite all of that you will have to poke my eyes out, steal my >>machines and lock me in a small room before you will pry Homesite >>out of my hands. > > > LOL - Amen! I'm still using it with the error, just need to find some > way to fix it. Likewise. Even limping along its a tool to be reckoned with. From psm2713 at hotmail.com Tue Nov 4 09:54:24 2003 From: psm2713 at hotmail.com (Ken Moore) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:54:24 -0700 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration Message-ID: Hi Roel, Roel Mulder wrote: >Hi all, >In januari 2003 we registered a .com domain. Yesterday we received an >e-mail of someone claiming they registered it prior to ourselves and >wanting to open up negotiations towards reclaiming it. > > >Tough for them. >The domain has since januari been directed to one of our websites, it >doesn't generate tarffic worth mentioning, we haven't received any mail >(spam included) so _if_ they ever had it registered they haven't used it. >Google's cash won't help. > >Anyone? > DO NOT GIVE IN ON THIS. Unfollowed intentions on their part should not cost you. Even if everything they say is true, it is not your problem. Besides, maybe they just want to get jump on name recognition by using your site. If they ever had it, they obviously did not use it. Ken _________________________________________________________________ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com From contact at stewartandcompany.net Tue Nov 4 09:54:48 2003 From: contact at stewartandcompany.net (Stewart & Company) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:54:48 -0500 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104121032.00a73f30@mta.nl> Message-ID: <000201c3a2eb$faa64200$f8a5aec7@Will> If I were you, I would pursue selling the domain to them. If they are a large company, you could potentially earn a large amount of money. If the domain is more important to you than the cash, tell them you are not interested. They have no contractual right to the domain name and, besides plaguing you with emails, can do nothing legally to reclaim it. HTH, Will -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Roel Mulder Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:22 AM To: The List Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration Hi all, In januari 2003 we registered a .com domain. Yesterday we received an e-mail of someone claiming they registered it prior to ourselves and wanting to open up negotiations towards reclaiming it. > Unfortunately due to techincial problems between the original registrar (corp1) > and corp2 Ltd we were unable to reregister the domain when it was due for > renewal and it now seems that you have registered the domain. Tough for them. Question : Is there a place where I can check their claim of the domainname being registered to them prior our registration? The domain has since januari been directed to one of our websites, it doesn't generate tarffic worth mentioning, we haven't received any mail (spam included) so _if_ they ever had it registered they haven't used it. Google's cash won't help. Anyone? Thanks, Roel Mulder -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From Anthony at Baratta.com Tue Nov 4 10:04:38 2003 From: Anthony at Baratta.com (Anthony Baratta) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:04:38 -0800 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104121032.00a73f30@mta.nl> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104080043.026cb0d0@baratta.com> At 03:21 AM 11/4/2003, Roel Mulder wrote: >Hi all, >In januari 2003 we registered a .com domain. Yesterday we received an >e-mail of someone claiming they registered it prior to ourselves and >wanting to open up negotiations towards reclaiming it. > > > Unfortunately due to techincial problems between the original registrar > (corp1) > > and corp2 Ltd we were unable to reregister the domain when it was due for > > renewal and it now seems that you have registered the domain. > >Tough for them. >Question : Is there a place where I can check their claim of the >domainname being registered to them prior our registration? > >The domain has since januari been directed to one of our websites, it >doesn't generate tarffic worth mentioning, we haven't received any mail >(spam included) so _if_ they ever had it registered they haven't used it. >Google's cash won't help. It can take 3 to 6 months for domains to be re-released, so they were pretty lame about getting it back. Most registrars charge about $100 to get a domain off the "pending" list, if you miss the renewal. Even then you have about 30 days after expiration to renew, sometimes 60 days. Plus they are contacting you 10 months after you purchased the domain?? So their excuse is pretty weak. You can try the internet archive, aka the internet way back machine to see if there was any content previously at the domain. http://www.archive.org/web/web.php If you can get a good price for it and have not integrated the new domain name into your marketing materials, I'd say sell it! --- Anthony Baratta President Keyboard Jockeys "Conformity is the refuge of the unimaginative." From roselli at earthlink.net Tue Nov 4 10:00:01 2003 From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:00:01 -0500 Subject: [thelist] XSL / XPath In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104105130.03304bb8@mail.sportsinteraction.com> Message-ID: drew... i don't have time to write up the code that you'd need, but take a look at the count() or position() functions... while looping (for-each), do a count on the nodes where the count()/position() is less than or equal to 2... that help at all? > From: Drew Shiel [...] > > > bettingtype="Outright" numrunners="20">2003 World Cup - > Outright > fractionprice="5/4 ">New Zealand > fractionprice="3/2 ">England > fractionprice="5/1 ">Australia > fractionprice="12/1 ">France > > > > I'm trying to work out the XSL/XPath stuff to say "Take the first two > runner nodes and do THIS with them", where THIS is dropping some of > the values into a HTML table. -- my latest book project: Web Graphics for Non-Designers http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591712/evoltorg02-20 ISBN: 1590591712 From r.mulder at mta.nl Tue Nov 4 09:59:18 2003 From: r.mulder at mta.nl (Roel Mulder) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:59:18 +0100 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration In-Reply-To: <97101976F8A044468CA74FE11883B90E031A8511@VISTA.roswellpark .org> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104165719.00a73dc0@212.204.230.40> At 10:44 04-11-2003 -0500, you wrote: > >Question : Is there a place where I can check their claim of the >domainname > >being registered to them prior our registration? > >Roel Mulder > >Not sure how you would verify this. >But you could try the "WayBackMachine": >http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.yahoo.com > >-Jon Nope, as they say: Sorry, no matches. Roel From hassan at webtuitive.com Tue Nov 4 10:19:27 2003 From: hassan at webtuitive.com (Hassan Schroeder) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:19:27 -0800 Subject: [thelist] XSL / XPath In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104105130.03304bb8@mail.sportsinteraction.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104105130.03304bb8@mail.sportsinteraction.com> Message-ID: <3FA7D18F.9000009@webtuitive.com> Drew Shiel wrote: > > > bettingtype="Outright" numrunners="20">2003 World Cup - Outright > fractionprice="5/4 ">New Zealand > fractionprice="3/2 ">England > fractionprice="5/1 ">Australia > fractionprice="12/1 ">France > > > > I'm trying to work out the XSL/XPath stuff to say "Take the first two > runner nodes and do THIS with them", where THIS is dropping some of the > values into a HTML table. Saving your sample data as `wtf.xml`, here's a quick JSP/JSTL snippet to illustrate. This static approach is quick'n'dirty and obviously doesn't give you the flexibility to, say, grab the top /three/ by just changing a variable. That said,
,,, are JSP taglibs markup; you'll have to adapt the XPath statements to your language of choice. HTH! -- Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- hassan at webtuitive.com Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. From pete.prodoehl at cygnusinteractive.com Tue Nov 4 10:19:33 2003 From: pete.prodoehl at cygnusinteractive.com (Pete Prodoehl) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:19:33 -0600 Subject: [thelist] png in IE In-Reply-To: <3FA68D4D.8000508@f2o.org> References: <000f01c3a228$8d4f4580$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> <3FA68D4D.8000508@f2o.org> Message-ID: <3FA7D195.7020304@cygnusinteractive.com> liorean wrote: > Marcus Andersson wrote: > >> I have these icons in png format and want to make use of them in IE. The >> icons have transparent backgrounds that works nicely in >> Mozilla/Photoshop. When I use them in IE I get this ugly grey background >> instead of the transparent one. >> Should I do anything special to make it work or should I consider to >> convert the icons to gif? > > > There's a number of things you could do. [snip] You could ask for proper PNG Support in Internet Explorer for Windows, like over 11,000 others have done... Who knows? Maybe in 2006 IE/Win will support PNG's properly! Pete From evolt_org at striderweb.com Tue Nov 4 10:22:56 2003 From: evolt_org at striderweb.com (Stephen Rider) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:22:56 -0600 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <25B07959-0EE3-11D8-8849-000A957FB6EA@striderweb.com> These guys aren't Nigerian Businessmen, are they? ;) You could, of course, offer to sell it to them for a nice price. You said it wasn't producing any traffic; they said they wanted to negotiate. So negotiate. Or if you don't want to sell, ignore them. Steve On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 09:54 AM, Ken Moore wrote: > Hi Roel, > > Roel Mulder wrote: > >> In januari 2003 we registered a .com domain. Yesterday we received an >> e-mail of someone claiming they registered it prior to ourselves and >> wanting to open up negotiations towards reclaiming it. > > DO NOT GIVE IN ON THIS. > > Unfollowed intentions on their part should not cost you. Even if > everything they say is true, it is not your problem. Besides, maybe > they just want to get jump on name recognition by using your site. If > they ever had it, they obviously did not use it. From gaelwolf at waypt.com Tue Nov 4 10:29:59 2003 From: gaelwolf at waypt.com (Norman MacLeod) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:29:59 -0800 Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104121032.00a73f30@mta.nl> Message-ID: <200311041630.hA4GUMV4008860@svs23.virtualis.com> Roel - Be very careful with this one... When a domain name expires, there's a long grace period between the time of expiration and the time that the domain is actually released to the public for new registration. Typically, a domain registrar will start notifying the domain registrant that the domain is up for renewal two or three months before the expiration date. If the registrant doesn't pay their annual fee prior to the domain's expiration date, the registrar will inactivate the domain, usually two days to as much as a month after the expiration date. Then follows a six-eight week grace period where the domain is in suspended status, but can be reactivated by the registrant simply paying their annual fee. So the "old" registrant, if they ever registered the domain, had somewhere between at least two to five months to pay their annual fee. You could contact ICANN at their site to see if they will provide you with the registration history for the domain, but I don't know if they will provide that information to you unless you are placed in arbitration in regard to the name. If your domain name does enter the dispute process, you will need to prove that the name is connected to some form of business that you are doing, that you are not infringing on a registered trade or service mark owned by the business wanting to claim the name from you, and that you are not using the domain in a manner that damages the other company's name. Another thing you can do is contact the company that claims to have registered the name in the past and require them to provide you with a photocopy of the last domain name registration invoice and the registrar's confirmation that they paid for their registration. If they do provide these documents to you, then contact the registrar to request confirmation that the documents are verifiable, and that the other company did, indeed, have the name registered at one time. Norman -----Original Message----- From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Roel Mulder Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:22 AM To: The List Subject: [thelist] History of domain registration Hi all, In januari 2003 we registered a .com domain. Yesterday we received an e-mail of someone claiming they registered it prior to ourselves and wanting to open up negotiations towards reclaiming it. > Unfortunately due to techincial problems between the original registrar (corp1) > and corp2 Ltd we were unable to reregister the domain when it was due for > renewal and it now seems that you have registered the domain. Tough for them. Question : Is there a place where I can check their claim of the domainname being registered to them prior our registration? The domain has since januari been directed to one of our websites, it doesn't generate tarffic worth mentioning, we haven't received any mail (spam included) so _if_ they ever had it registered they haven't used it. Google's cash won't help. Anyone? Thanks, Roel Mulder -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From ashiel at sportsinteraction.com Tue Nov 4 10:43:20 2003 From: ashiel at sportsinteraction.com (Drew Shiel) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:43:20 +0000 Subject: [thelist] XSL / XPath In-Reply-To: <200311041624593.SM04104@acornparenting.org> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104105130.03304bb8@mail.sportsinteraction.com> Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104164122.03335e40@mail.sportsinteraction.com> At 11:00 04/11/2003 -0500, aardvark wrote: I found it just before this came in. What I needed was: and STUFF HERE And it works. :) Cheers, Drew. >drew... i don't have time to write up the code that you'd need, but >take a look at the count() or position() functions... > >while looping (for-each), do a count on the nodes where the >count()/position() is less than or equal to 2... > >that help at all? > > > From: Drew Shiel >[...] > > > > > > > bettingtype="Outright" numrunners="20">2003 World Cup - > > Outright > > > fractionprice="5/4 ">New Zealand > > > fractionprice="3/2 ">England > > > fractionprice="5/1 ">Australia > > > fractionprice="12/1 ">France > > > > > > > > I'm trying to work out the XSL/XPath stuff to say "Take the first two > > runner nodes and do THIS with them", where THIS is dropping some of > > the values into a HTML table. > >-- >my latest book project: > Web Graphics for Non-Designers > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590591712/evoltorg02-20 > ISBN: 1590591712 >-- >* * Please support the community that supports you. * * >http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > >For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester >and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org >Workers of the Web, evolt ! From pixelmech at yahoo.com Tue Nov 4 10:48:35 2003 From: pixelmech at yahoo.com (Tom Dell'Aringa) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:48:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: [thelist] tracking a url Message-ID: <20031104164835.86800.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> Hi folks, I have a situation where a parent company web site is linking to some of its own company web sites that are other brands. So for example, on web site "Main" we have this link:
Find out more! There are about 4 of these, each one different. The issue is the Main company wants to track how many people click this link and where they go. I believe we have Web Trends running for the Main site. They suggested having a 'redirect' page that passes the link of the company ("companyA") the user clicked. So an asp that gets that value in the URL, where it can be tracked, then using a redirect to send them to that page. Is it me or is this really stupid? Shouldn't web trends be able to track that the above HREF was an exit link? I'm not up to speed on web trends yet but I know its fairly robust. The key is they want to know how many times somebody clicked that link and left the site - and *which* site they went to. It seems to me this redirect page is unnecessary... what do you all think? Tom ===== http://www.pixelmech.com/ :: Web Development Services http://www.DMXzone.com/ :: JavaScript Author / Every Friday! http://www.thywordistruth.net/ :: Eternal Life "I'll ho ho and ha ha you!" (Daffy Duck) From marcan at home.se Tue Nov 4 11:09:41 2003 From: marcan at home.se (Marcus Andersson) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:09:41 +0100 Subject: SV: [thelist] XSL / XPath In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031104105130.03304bb8@mail.sportsinteraction.com> Message-ID: <002b01c3a2f6$6fb5dd30$03a8a8c0@marcusnb> I provide an example below. A comment about your xpath question is placed in your code. /Marcus
-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] F?r Drew Shiel Skickat: den 4 november 2003 11:52 Till: thelist at lists.evolt.org ?mne: [thelist] XSL / XPath Here's a chunk of XML: 2003 World Cup - Outright New Zealand England Australia France I'm trying to work out the XSL/XPath stuff to say "Take the first two runner nodes and do THIS with them", where THIS is dropping some of the values into a HTML table. Anyone able to explain it? The XPath things have me baffled. Drew. Drew Shiel, Web Development, Sports Interaction ashiel at sportsinteraction.com http://www.sportsinteraction.com/ +353-1-2365701 (Direct Line) -- * * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt ! From Tim.Kuhn at gettyimages.com Tue Nov 4 11:12:53 2003 From: Tim.Kuhn at gettyimages.com (Tim Kuhn (temp)) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:12:53 -0800 Subject: [thelist] RE: XSL / XPath Message-ID: <05B9FC51BB35C247859214C18073CCB90649F8@seafrexchrestor.sea.amer.gettywan.com> I think that this is what you want, this will select the inner-text if that is what you want: If you an attribute then: That will give you the first runner nodes id. Careful it is all case sensitive. A good link for XPath is http://www.zvon.org/xxl/XPathTutorial/General/examples.html I hope that helps! -----Original Message----- Here's a chunk of XML: 2003 World Cup - Outright New Zealand England Australia France I'm trying to work out the XSL/XPath stuff to say "Take the first two runner nodes and do THIS with them", where THIS is dropping some of the values into a HTML table. Anyone able to explain it? The XPath things have me baffled. ------------------------------ ======================================================= This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. ======================================================= From robert at thewhitehousegroup.com Tue Nov 4 10:37:01 2003 From: robert at thewhitehousegroup.com (Robert) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:37:01 -0500 Subject: [thelist] ASP question - User List Update Message-ID: I have a question regarding a chat page that I have in it's final stages of completion. It is .asp driven, and I'm pleased with the way it works, except for one feature that wont seem to work properly. The page keeps a simple text log in html code of each user who signs onto the page. I want it set up so that when a user unloads the page, a javascript onUnload command launches a final .asp alerting the user that they have logged off the page. Additionally, the script will delete that particular user from the user log. I use cookies to keep track of the user and their color selection, but for some reason the code I'm using is deleting ALL users from the user database. HELP! The following is the script I'm trying to use for the "logoff": <% 'Set Constants Const ForReading = 1, ForWriting = 2, ForAppending = 8 'find out this particular users name name=request.Cookies("name") 'find out this particular users Color color=request.Cookies("color") 'Open the user database into memory Set objFS = Server.CreateObject ("Scripting.FileSystemObject") set objFile = objFS.GetFile(server.mappath("users.dat")) set textstream = objFile.OpenAsTextStream(ForReading, -2) 'set up the loop that will compare the files and set variables do while not textstream.AtEndOfStream singleline = textstream.ReadLine user=singleline 'Comparison line that works no matter the user name or color if singleline=""& name &"
" then user=" " end if set relog = objFS.CreateTextFile(server.mappath("users.dat"), true) relog.WriteLine(""& user &"") loop 'close the file textstream.close relog.close %> User Logged Off Of Chat Server I'm VERY new to .asp (less than a week working with it as the code above probably shows in it's sloppiness!) and have no idea why this isn't working properly. Another route I've tried is simply doing a line by line and dumping each line into a variable that would then be written all at once, but I'm fuzzy on the way .asp allows concatenation of strings vs. numeric values. Thanks for ANY help! ~Qixsilver From aaron at aaroncole.com Tue Nov 4 11:26:45 2003 From: aaron at aaroncole.com (Aaron Cole) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:26:45 -0800 Subject: [thelist] AgoraCart? Message-ID: <104D707F-0EEC-11D8-9672-000A959D9FBC@aaroncole.com> Has anyone here had experience using AgoraCart (www.agoracart.com)? Good/Bad? It's a freeware shopping cart system that I've been asked to research. TIA, Aaron From and-evolt at doxdesk.com Tue Nov 4 11:51:37 2003 From: and-evolt at doxdesk.com (Andrew Clover) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:51:37 +0000 Subject: [thelist] tracking a url In-Reply-To: <20031104164835.86800.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031104164835.86800.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20031104175137.GA1993@doxdesk.com> Tom Dell'Aringa wrote: > They suggested having a 'redirect' page that passes the link of the > company ("companyA") the user clicked. This is a common (albeit rather irritating) practice, yes. > Is it me or is this really stupid? Shouldn't web trends be able to > track that the above HREF was an exit link? Not really, no. Only incoming hits are counted and available for the log analyser to play with. An analyser like WebTrends can say what page was the last thing a user viewed on your site (by using cookies and/or Intelli-Guessing[TM]) but not whether that page was left due to a closed window, followed link, or something else. The obvious workaround is to run a log analyser on the companyA site and see how many referrals you get from the main site. > It seems to me this redirect page is unnecessary... If Management insist on having the statistic without running log analysers on the other sites, and don't care about the (minor) inconvenience it places on users, I'm afraid something like this is necessary. There are a few other ways to do it, for example having a plain link but with a bit of onclick JavaScript that sends a request back to the main server through a web bug or such. -- Andrew Clover mailto:and at doxdesk.com http://www.doxdesk.com/ From Anthony at Baratta.com Tue Nov 4 12:12:59 2003 From: Anthony at Baratta.com (Anthony Baratta) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:12:59 -0800 Subject: [thelist] tracking a url In-Reply-To: <20031104164835.86800.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20031104101127.026d4a08@baratta.com> At 08:48 AM 11/4/2003, Tom Dell'Aringa wrote: >They suggested having a 'redirect' page that passes the link of the >company ("companyA") the user clicked. So an asp that gets that value >in the URL, where it can be tracked, then using a redirect to send >them to that page. > >Is it me or is this really stupid? Shouldn't web trends be able to >track that the above HREF was an exit link? I'm not up to speed on >web trends yet but I know its fairly robust. > >The key is they want to know how many times somebody clicked that >link and left the site - and *which* site they went to. It seems to >me this redirect page is unnecessary... what do you all think? How will your server know they clicked on the link and went to the other site? That information is recorded at the other site via the referrer, not your site. IMvHO - Having a redirect page is the simplest and most efficient way to track links leading off your site. -- Anthony Baratta President Keyboard Jockeys "Conformity is the refuge of the unimaginative." From hassan at webtuitive.com Tue Nov 4 12:16:54 2003 From: hassan at webtuitive.com (Hassan Schroeder) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:16:54 -0800 Subject: [thelist] tracking a url In-Reply-To: <20031104164835.86800.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031104164835.86800.qmail@web12601.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3FA7ED16.2020700@webtuitive.com> Tom Dell'Aringa wrote: > I have a situation where a parent company web site is linking to some > of its own company web sites that are other brands. So for example, > on web site "Main" we have this link: > > Find out more! > They suggested having a 'redirect' page that passes the link of the > company ("companyA") the user clicked. So an asp that gets that value > in the URL, where it can be tracked, then using a redirect to send > them to that page. > > Is it me or is this really stupid? Shouldn't web trends be able to > track that the above HREF was an exit link? ?! Logs show page requests. The logs of the "Main.com" site that web trends is analyzing don't have any requests for pages on "companyA.com". So yes, the choices are 1) use a redirector (this is pretty common) or 2) merge the logs from all the affiliates and the main company. HTH! -- Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- hassan at webtuitive.com Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. From saodl at yahoo.com Tue Nov 4 12:19:01 2003 From: saodl at yahoo.com (Siri Atma Oaklander De Licori) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: [thelist] hiding html source code Message-ID: <20031104181901.57417.qmail@web12705.mail.yahoo.com> Hi Tim, I tend to agree with everyone else here that trying to hide your source code is somewhat pointless...you can only really obfuscate it, and proposals are better done with images and diagrams. Nonetheless if you really want to do it, the best way I know of is to use a base page with a hidden (or dynamicaly created) iframe to load the html you actually want to show into the browser. HTML dynamically added like this is not (in my experience) available when you 'view source'. However keeping someone from looking at the source and going directly to the page you're loading is another problem...if you want to avoid that you may have to put a password dialog on the loading page and get the actual page through some sort of server side scripting. That'll slow down most people pretty good, but remember that whatever you do the information has to be on their computer to be displayed so it will always be possible to circumvent your precautions. You just have to decide if it's worth the trouble. Here's a function for dynamicaly creating an IFrame and loading a page into it. You'll then have to put a function call to returnResults() in the loaded page's body onload event to trigger script for moving the content to the appropriate location. Good luck. Siri PS. If anyone knows a better way to load additional html content into a page, I'd love to hear your input. // BEGIN CODE BLOCK // I got the basic script for this from // David Flanagan's JavaScript the // Definitive Guide, published by O'Rielly // and then modified it. var IFrameObj; // our IFrame object var gsDestination; // the name of the object where the // result will be sent. Can be an // object reference. Set to // 'Do Not Return' if you want to // do something else with the data // rather than just plugging it in. // Usually you'd call a processing // function with gsCallAfter. var gsCallAfter; // an optional string used to run script // with setTimout after page load. // 1st call: creates iframe, sets to IFrameObj. // loads URL into the iframe. // sets gsDestination to the display object. function callToServer(URL,sReturnTo,sCallAfter) { if (!document.createElement) {return true}; var IFrameDoc; gsDestination = sReturnTo; gsCallAfter = sCallAfter; if (!IFrameObj && document.createElement) { // create the IFrame and assign a reference to the // object to our global variable IFrameObj. // this will only happen the first time // callToServer() is called try { var tempIFrame=document.createElement('iframe'); tempIFrame.setAttribute('id','RSIFrame'); tempIFrame.style.border='0px'; tempIFrame.style.width='0px'; tempIFrame.style.height='0px'; IFrameObj = document.body.appendChild(tempIFrame); if (document.frames) { // this is for IE5 Mac, because it will only // allow access to the document object // of the IFrame if we access it through // the document.frames array IFrameObj = document.frames['RSIFrame']; } } catch(exception) { // This is for IE5 PC, which does not allow dynamic creation // and manipulation of an iframe object. Instead, we'll fake // it up by creating our own objects. iframeHTML='\