[thelist] Re: [css-d] semantic urls and separators do_this.or.do.that ?
James
james at practicalcss.com
Fri Apr 23 21:16:07 CDT 2004
Underscores are usually a safe bet, and that's what I've typically used.
They make it URL-safe, but also quite readable.
Pure CSS web design - http://www.practicalcss.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Blanchard" <octigonuser at hotmail.com>
To: <thelist at lists.evolt.org>; <css-d at lists.css-discuss.org>
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:01 PM
Subject: [css-d] semantic urls and separators do_this.or.do.that ?
> My team is currently looking at how our CMS produces links and urls. Since
> the upcoming release will be championing web standards as a virtue, we are
> committed to producing hackable, practical, usable URLS, instead of the
> current default.aspx?id=x format.
>
> One question has emerged however, that I would like to pose. For pages
whose
> names contain more than one word such as "About Us" for example, has there
> emerged an accepted standard for url concatenating?
...
More information about the thelist
mailing list